1 comment  

By Michael Kerstetter

The Center for Climate Change Law has published a working paper on bundling solutions for energy efficiency (EE) retrofit projects in residential and commercial buildings. The paper provides a brief discussion on the EE retrofit market generally, touching on the current efficiency gap and barriers to EE retrofit projects and continues with an introduction to the concept of bundling as a possible guiding principle for further unlocking greater investment in building EE retrofit projects. The paper also presents a summary of the main financing and business models in use today in the U.S. which utilize some form of bundling in their design or application.

Since the 1970’s much activity has been undertaken at the federal, state and local levels among government and nongovernmental actors to promote EE standards and practices. Today, some forty years later, at a time when energy policy, energy prices and energy security are still at the forefront of public debate, many feel that EE technologies and practices are falling far short of their potential. In fact, many consider EE to be one of the largest and most cost-effective untapped energy resources in the U.S.

Given that buildings are responsible for approximately 40% of overall national energy consumption, increased investment in EE projects and measures in that sector could potentially save consumers and the U.S. economy billions of dollars, create jobs and significantly reduce the emission of greenhouse gasses. Accordingly, a comprehensive and well crafted economy-wide EE solution should include programs for the upgrading or retrofitting of existing residential and commercial structures. Although there is already investment in these types of projects, significant potential still remains for further profitable investment.

The full paper is available here.

One comment

  1. It is amazing to me that 40% of our overall national energy use is the result of buildings. It is good to see that The Center for Climate Change Law is being proactive with coming up for solutions for energy efficiency. I am curious to see if some of the solutions published in this paper are put into use.

Add a comment

Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.


This blog provides a forum for legal and policy analysis on a variety of climate-related issues. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the individual authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Climate Change Law.

Climate Law Links




Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2022, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.