Climate Reregulation in a Biden Administration


Posted on August 26th, 2020 by grennanmilliken
 1 comment  

The White House, Washington, D.C. Source: Cezary P, Creative Commons

Since January 2017, the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University has been tracking the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to rewrite federal climate change policy and deconstruct climate governance. Today, the Sabin Center released a collaboratively authored report that outlines a series of executive actions that a Biden administration could take to do the opposite: reregulate greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and achieve other mitigation and adaptation goals.

This report, Climate Reregulation in a Biden Administration, focuses on actions a new administration could take to change course on these deregulatory measures. We assume, for purposes of this report, that a Biden administration would face a divided Congress unwilling to implement any legislative reregulation measures, including invoking the Congressional Review Act, and so focus only on executive actions. Numerous steps are described in this report, ranging from revoking President Trump’s executive orders on Day One, to initiating new rulemakings to begin the long process of undoing the Trump administration’s climate-damaging final rules. The report will be periodically updated between now and Election Day.

Some of the most significant of the reregulatory actions detailed in the report include those that will be most familiar; for example, rejoining the Paris Agreement, reversing the so-called Affordable Clean Energy (“ACE”) Rule, and reinstating GHG emissions standards for motor vehicles. But these actions are just a few of the many that a Biden administration could take in January 2021 and onward. From the muzzling of the science and assessment that informs environmental regulation and federal decision-making, to weakening hallmark public health protections like the Clean Air Act and forward-looking initiatives like enforcing a federal flood protection standard, to endangering America’s largest tract of wilderness in Alaska for the sake of a declining oil market, the Trump administration’s attacks on climate and environmental protections have been vast and insidious. But as this report makes clear, a Biden administration could quickly overturn many of them—reregulate as opposed to deregulate—and get the United States back on track with climate policy.

To see a table summarizing the reregulatory actions detailed in the report, see here.

To see our model Executive Order, see here.

One comment

  1. Excellent work. Congratulations. Please continue full speed ahead.

    Two additional policy topics with many regulatory implications that need attention:

    1. Protect the Arctic region because of the global consequences of Arctic warming. This year’s temperatures and ice melts are setting new records. The current administration blocked mentioning climate change in an Arctic Council meeting.

    2. Give black carbon (BC) more attention. It is the second leading global warming agent worldwide after CO2. Because it is particulate matter – not a gas – it is often neglected in analyses of global warming agents. However, the US EPA had been doing a lot of good work on BC issues before the current administration. A Biden administration could build on the EPA’s earlier analytic work as well as the work of think tanks and individual scholars as the scientific basis for policy initiatives.

Add a comment


Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.

LexisNexis Environmental Law and Climate Change Community 2011 Top 50 Blogs

Disclaimer

This blog provides a forum for legal and policy analysis on a variety of climate-related issues. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the individual authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Center for Climate Change Law.

Climate Law Links

Subscribe

Archives

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.