{"id":272,"date":"2018-01-27T15:23:38","date_gmt":"2018-01-27T20:23:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/?p=272"},"modified":"2018-01-27T15:23:38","modified_gmt":"2018-01-27T20:23:38","slug":"hearing-scheduled-for-january-31-2018-in-federal-court-in-birmingham-alabama","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/2018\/01\/27\/hearing-scheduled-for-january-31-2018-in-federal-court-in-birmingham-alabama\/","title":{"rendered":"Hearing Scheduled for January 31, 2018, in Federal Court in Birmingham, Alabama"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The federal district court in Birmingham, Alabama, has scheduled a hearing on Doyle Hamm&#8217;s \u00a71983 challenge to his lethal injection to address the state of Alabama&#8217;s motion for summary judgment. The federal court will receive evidence on the risk of significant harm to Doyle Hamm and alternative methods of execution.<\/p>\n<p>The hearing will begin at\u00a09am\u00a0on Wednesday, January 31, 2018, in <span class=\"il\">Courtroom<\/span> <span class=\"il\">8<\/span> of the Hugo L. Black U. S. Courthouse\u00a0in downtown Birmingham, Alabama. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.alnd.uscourts.gov\">federal courthouse<\/a> is located at 1729 5th Avenue North,\u00a0Birmingham, AL 35203.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The federal district court in Birmingham, Alabama, has scheduled a hearing on Doyle Hamm&#8217;s \u00a71983 challenge to his lethal injection to address the state of Alabama&#8217;s motion for summary judgment. The federal court will receive evidence on the risk of significant harm to Doyle Hamm and alternative methods of execution. The hearing will begin at\u00a09am\u00a0on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1641,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-272","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"czr-hentry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/272","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1641"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=272"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/272\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}