{"id":223,"date":"2017-11-28T21:55:17","date_gmt":"2017-11-29T02:55:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/?p=223"},"modified":"2017-11-28T21:55:17","modified_gmt":"2017-11-29T02:55:17","slug":"october-4-2017-alabama-supreme-court-asks-attorney-general-to-respond","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/2017\/11\/28\/october-4-2017-alabama-supreme-court-asks-attorney-general-to-respond\/","title":{"rendered":"October 4, 2017 | Alabama Supreme Court Asks Attorney General to Respond"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On October 4, 2017, the Alabama Supreme Court requested that the Alabama Attorney General respond to Doyle Hamm&#8217;s latest pleading urging the Court not to set an execution date. The Court&#8217;s order is in the Pleadings folder <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/pleadings\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On October 4, 2017, the Alabama Supreme Court requested that the Alabama Attorney General respond to Doyle Hamm&#8217;s latest pleading urging the Court not to set an execution date. The Court&#8217;s order is in the Pleadings folder here.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1641,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-223","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"czr-hentry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1641"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}