{"id":153,"date":"2017-07-20T18:59:17","date_gmt":"2017-07-20T22:59:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/?p=153"},"modified":"2017-07-20T19:03:49","modified_gmt":"2017-07-20T23:03:49","slug":"july-14-2017-alabama-supreme-court-grants-doyle-hamms-motion-for-enlargement-of-time-to-respond","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/2017\/07\/20\/july-14-2017-alabama-supreme-court-grants-doyle-hamms-motion-for-enlargement-of-time-to-respond\/","title":{"rendered":"July 14, 2017 | Alabama Supreme Court Grants Doyle Hamm’s Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Bastille Day,\u00a0July 14, 2017, the Alabama Supreme Court granted Doyle Hamm’s motion for more time to respond to the state’s motion to set an execution date. Mr. Hamm has until August 8, 2017, to respond.<\/p>\n

A PDF of the document is available on the PLEADINGS page here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Bastille Day,\u00a0July 14, 2017, the Alabama Supreme Court granted Doyle Hamm’s motion for more time to respond to the state’s motion to set an execution date. Mr. Hamm has until August 8, 2017, to respond. A PDF of the document is available on the PLEADINGS page here.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1641,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[56328],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-153","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-rulings","7":"czr-hentry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1641"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/update-hamm-v-alabama\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}