{"id":32,"date":"2018-08-08T19:20:48","date_gmt":"2018-08-08T23:20:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/?page_id=32"},"modified":"2019-06-26T13:39:46","modified_gmt":"2019-06-26T17:39:46","slug":"13-13","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/13-13\/","title":{"rendered":"13\/13 | The Space of Praxis &#8211; May 8, 2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/ylcUy_BuSPQ\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\">Amy Allen, philosopher (<a href=\"https:\/\/philosophy.la.psu.edu\/directory\/ara17\">Penn State University)<\/a>, Carolin Emcke (writer and journalist, <a href=\"https:\/\/carolin-emcke.de\/en\/\">Berlin<\/a>), Heather Ann Thompson (Pulitzer Prize winning historian, <a href=\"https:\/\/lsa.umich.edu\/daas\/people\/core-faculty\/hthompsn.html\">University of Michigan<\/a>), and Bernard E. Harcourt (CCCCT, <a href=\"https:\/\/cgt.columbia.edu\/about\/people\/committee-faculty\/bernard-e-harcourt\/\">Columbia University<\/a>)<\/h2>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\">discuss<\/h2>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\">The Space of\u00a0<em>P<\/em><em>raxis<\/em><\/h2>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\">Readings <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/praxis-13-13-readings\/\">available here<\/a>.<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/13-13\/13-13-block-2\/#main\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-4906\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4906\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/06\/13.13-Block.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"528\" height=\"265\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/06\/13.13-Block.png 528w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/06\/13.13-Block-300x151.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 528px) 100vw, 528px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>We arrive at the final session of Praxis 13\/13 having explored a wide range of modalities of contemporary critical practice, from the Left Populism of Chantal Mouffe and (perhaps) Bernie Sanders, theories of assembly with Judith Butler, Michael Hardt and Toni Negri, and the idea of \u201cthe common,\u201d to the radical anarchist separatism of the Invisible Committee in France and the explosive \u201cUndercommons\u201d of Fred Moten and Stefano Harney, to Frankfurt School praxis with Martin Saar, death fasts, self-immolation, and the weaponization of life with Banu Bargu, and Bruno Latour\u2019s urgent invitation to address global climate change. We have, over the course of the 2018-2019 year, surveyed the field of contemporary critical practice\u2014what we might call \u201cthe space of praxis.\u201d It is now time to reflect on that space.<\/p>\n<p>For our final session, we had originally planned to focus on one last set of praxis readings that include Hakim Bey\u2019s <em>The Temporary Autonomous Zone\u00a0<\/em>(1985) and Joshua Clover\u2019s <em>Riot. Strike. Riot\u00a0<\/em>(2016). Those critical texts develop two other important directions in contemporary practice: first, the creation of autonomous zones such as, most recently in the news, the \u201c<em>zone \u00e0 d\u00e9fendre<\/em>\u201d (ZAD) at Notre-Dame-des-Landes outside of Nantes, France, which involved a decades-long peaceful occupation of lands with a political and environmental agenda, originally opposed to the enlargement of the Nantes airport; and second, the increasing practice of riots and looting as forms of uprising tied to our current political-economic condition of neoliberal consumption capitalism. Both of these texts\u2014to which I will come back to in a moment\u2014are essential building blocks in the effort to map the space of praxis.<\/p>\n<p>But rather than end on a close reading of these texts, we have invited three extraordinary critical theorists\u2014the philosopher Amy Allen, the war reporter and Berlin performer Carolin Emcke, and the Pulitzer-Prize winning historian Heather Ann Thompson\u2014to reflect more broadly on this \u201cspace of praxis\u201d today\u2014from the perspective of critical philosophy, critical practice, and critical history.<\/p>\n<p>We will begin with the philosopher and critical theorist <a href=\"https:\/\/philosophy.la.psu.edu\/people\/ara17\">Amy Allen<\/a>\u2014one of the critical thinkers who has done the most to integrate the Frankfurt School writings with post-colonial, queer, and decolonial critical theory\u2014who will open with a philosophical examination of praxis in conversation with the debate between <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/nancy-fraser-and-rahel-jaeggi-contesting-capitalism\/\">Nancy Fraser and Rahel Jaeggi<\/a> on capitalism titled \u201cContesting Capitalism,\u201d and Wendy Brown\u2019s essay, \u201cNeoliberalism\u2019s Frankenstein: Authoritarian Freedom in Twenty-First Century \u2018Democracies\u2019\u201d in <a href=\"https:\/\/ctjournal.org\/index.php\/criticaltimes\/issue\/view\/1\"><em>Critical Times<\/em>, Volume 1<\/a>(2018). Allen will develop further her ideas about how to think about psychoanalysis as a model for doing social critique\u2014and the implications for critical praxis of taking it as a model\u2014that she began to develop in her 2016 esssay in <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/amy-allen-psychoanalysis-and-the-methodology-of-critique\/\"><em>Constellations<\/em><\/a>, \u201cPsychoanalysis and the Methodology of Critique.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The author, journalist, performer, and critical theorist, <a href=\"https:\/\/carolin-emcke.de\/en\/\">Carolin Emcke<\/a>, joins us from Berlin and will explore what it means to travel back and forth from the university and philosophy to regions of crises as a war reporter and critical theorist, in order to elaborate \u201cthe space of praxis\u201d in terms of what she calls \u201chidden spaces, restricted spaces, gendered spaces,\u201d as well as \u201cspace as contested territory: ethnic cleansing, territory of natives\u201d and \u201cspace in a broader sense as visibility: different strategies to make invisible people visible.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Pulitzer-Prize winning historian and critical theorist, <a href=\"https:\/\/lsa.umich.edu\/daas\/people\/core-faculty\/hthompsn.html\">Heather Ann Thompson<\/a>, will then discuss the theory and praxis implications surrounding the prison abolition movements today to think through the theory of prison abolition in this moment of such severe prison crises. Heather Thompson has curated for us a number of important readings on prison abolition and prison reform\u2014and how reform itself might perpetuate the crisis\u2014and they are <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/praxis-13-13-readings\/\">available on-line here<\/a>. They include work by <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/are-prison-obsolete-chapter-1\/\">Angela Davis<\/a>\u00a0and a chapter from the report \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/johnjay.jjay.cuny.edu\/nrc\/NAS_report_on_incarceration.pdf\">The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences<\/a>\u201d (2014), by the National Academy of Sciences panel on which Heather Thompson herself sat.<\/p>\n<p>Welcome to Praxis 13\/13!<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/13-13\/img_6231\/#main\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-4869\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-4869\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_6231-300x211.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"211\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_6231-300x211.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_6231-768x539.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_6231-1024x719.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_6231.jpg 1530w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/13-13\/img_2515\/#main\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-4867\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-4867\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_2515-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"282\" height=\"211\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_2515-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_2515-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_2515-1024x768.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 282px) 100vw, 282px\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/13-13\/img_2524\/#main\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-4868\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-4868\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_2524-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_2524-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_2524-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_2524-1024x768.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/13-13\/img_6234\/#main\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-4870\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-4870\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_6234-300x236.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"286\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_6234-300x236.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_6234-768x604.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_6234-1024x806.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/files\/2019\/05\/IMG_6234.jpg 1305w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 286px) 100vw, 286px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>[Read full post <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/bernard-e-harcourt-the-space-of-praxis-an-introduction\/\">here<\/a>.\u00a0 \u00a9 Bernard E. Harcourt.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Amy Allen, philosopher (Penn State University), Carolin Emcke (writer and journalist, Berlin), Heather Ann Thompson (Pulitzer Prize winning historian, University of Michigan), and Bernard E. Harcourt (CCCCT, Columbia University) discuss The Space of\u00a0Praxis Readings available here. We arrive at the&hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/13-13\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue Reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1603,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-32","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/32","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1603"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/32\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/praxis1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}