{"id":1268,"date":"2017-01-21T16:26:49","date_gmt":"2017-01-21T21:26:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/nietzsche1313\/?p=1268"},"modified":"2017-01-21T16:29:42","modified_gmt":"2017-01-21T21:29:42","slug":"daniele-lorenzini-and-martina-tazzioli-on-fanon-and-foucault","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/nietzsche1313\/daniele-lorenzini-and-martina-tazzioli-on-fanon-and-foucault\/","title":{"rendered":"Daniele Lorenzini and Martina Tazzioli on Fanon and Foucault"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n

Confessional Subjects and Conducts of Non-Truth:<\/strong>
\nFoucault, Fanon, and the Making of the Subject<\/strong>
\nDaniele Lorenzini & Martina Tazzioli<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Theory, Culture & Society<\/em>
\nArticle first published online:\u00a0January 1, 2017<\/p>\n

This article puts Michel Foucault and Frantz Fanon into dialogue in order to explore the relationships between the constitution of subjects and the production of truth in modern Western societies as well as in colonial spaces. Firstly, it takes into account Foucault\u2019s analysis of confessional practices and the effects of subjection, objectivation, and subjectivation generated by the injunction for the subject to tell the truth about him or herself. Secondly, it focuses on the question of interpellation that emerges in the colonial context and on the colonized who, as Fanon illustrates, is always seen as a deceitful subject. Finally, it shows that, despite the difference in the relationships between the constitution of subjectivity and the production of true discourses described by Foucault and Fanon, the transformative dimension enacted by the processes of subjectivation and by the practices of resistance constitutes a shared conceptual and political ground between the two authors.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

Continue reading<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Confessional Subjects and Conducts of Non-Truth: Foucault, Fanon, and the Making of the Subject Daniele Lorenzini & Martina Tazzioli Theory, Culture & Society Article first published online:\u00a0January 1, 2017 This article puts Michel Foucault and Frantz Fanon into dialogue in… Continue Reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1874,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[38980,38981],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-resources-8-13","category-resources-9-13"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/nietzsche1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/nietzsche1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/nietzsche1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/nietzsche1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1874"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/nietzsche1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/nietzsche1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1268\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/nietzsche1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/nietzsche1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/nietzsche1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}