Reading Capital<\/em> by Louis Althusser, \u00c9tienne Balibar, Roger Establet, Pierre Macherey and Jacques Ranci\u00e8re (1965)<\/p>\n Louis Althusser on “Symptomatic reading,” from Reading<\/em>\u00a0Capital, <\/em>Part One, pages 9-28<\/a>.<\/p>\n Louis Althusser on “Historical Time” and “Marxism not a Historicism,” from Reading Capital, <\/em>Part Four, Chapters 4 and 5, pages 237-295<\/a>.<\/p>\n Jacques Ranci\u00e8re on “Science and Critique,” from\u00a0Reading Capital<\/em>, Part Two, Chapter 2,\u00a0pages 150-169<\/a>.<\/p>\n “Althusser’s Marx.<\/a>” Leszek Kolakowski<\/p>\n “Considerations on Western Marxism<\/a>” Anderson Perry.<\/p>\n \u201cHistory of Science and Science of History.<\/a>\u201d Maria Turchetto. The Althusserian Legacy<\/em>, by E. Ann Kaplan and Michael Sprinker, Verso, 2010, pp. 73\u201380.<\/p>\n “How to Use\u00a0Lire le Capital,<\/em><\/a>” Jacques Ranci\u00e8re.\u00a0Economy and Society<\/em>. 28 Jul 2006. 377-384.<\/p>\n “Marxism and Historicism,<\/a>” The Ideologies of Theory Essays 1971-1986 Volume II: The Syntax of History<\/em>, Frederic Jameson. History of Literature<\/em>, Vol. 49.<\/p>\n “Le Recommencement du Materialisme Dialectique<\/a>,” Alain Badiou. Critique<\/em>. 23:240. May, 1967. 438-467.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Banu Bargu & Robyn Marasco: “The Political Encounter with Louis Althusser<\/a>“, (2019) Rethinking Marxism<\/em>, 31:3, 239-241<\/p>\n Louis Althusser: \u201cFreud and Lacan<\/a>\u201d (1963) in New Left Review<\/em> 1\/55 May-June 1969<\/p>\n Louis Althusser: \u201cIs it Simple To be A Marxist in Philosophy?\u201d in Essays in Self-Criticism<\/em>, New Left Books (1976), pp. 163\u2013215<\/p>\n Louis Althusser: \u201cOn Marx and Freud<\/a>\u201d (1976), Rethinking Marxism<\/em>, 4\/1, 1991,<\/p>\n Louis Althusser: \u201cThe Underground Current of the Philosophy of the Encounter\u201d, in Philosophy of the Encounter. Later Writings 1978-1987, <\/em>Verso, London and New York, 2006<\/p>\n Perry Anderson: Considerations on Western Marxism<\/em>, NLB 1976\/Verso 1979 (especially chapters 3 and 4)<\/p>\n Etienne Balibar : \u201cEschatology versus teleology : The suspended dialogue between Derrida and Althusser\u201d, In Pheng Cheah & Suzanne Guerlac (eds.),\u00a0Derrida and the Time of the Political<\/em>. Duke University Press (2009)<\/p>\n Etienne Balibar : \u201cAlthusser’s dramaturgy and the critique of ideology<\/a>\u00a0\u00bb (replies by Butler, Montag, Ophir, Bargu, Robbins, Liu, Cohen Shabot), Differences<\/em><\/a>\u00a026 (3):1-22 (2015)<\/p>\n Emilio De Ipola: \u201cAlthusser. The Infinite Farewell\u201d, translated by Gavin Arnall, preface by Etienne Balibar, Duke University Press, 2018<\/p>\n Gilles Deleuze : \u201cHow Do We Recognize Structuralism?<\/a>\u201d (1972) (reprinted in Desert Island and other texts)<\/em><\/p>\n Stuart Hall: “Signification, representation, ideology<\/a>: Althusser and the post\u2010structuralist debates\u201d, Critical Studies in Mass Communications, <\/em>Volume 2, 1985\/2<\/p>\n Jean Hyppolite: \u201cA new perspective on Marx and Marxism<\/a>\u00a0\u00bb (1971), Pli <\/em>24 (2013)<\/p>\n Leszek Kolakowski\u00a0: \u00ab\u00a0Althusser\u2019s Marx<\/a>\u00a0\u00bb, in Socialist Register (<\/em>1971)<\/p>\n Warren Montag: Althusser and His Contemporaries. Philosophy\u2019s Perpetual War, <\/em>Duke University Press 2013<\/p>\n Edward Palmer Thompson: The Poverty of Theory or an Orrery of Errors<\/em><\/a> (1978), Monthly Review Press 2008<\/p>\n The Concept in Crisis: <\/em>Reading Capital Today<\/em>, edited by Nick Nesbitt, Duke University Press 2017<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Primary Reading Reading Capital by Louis Althusser, \u00c9tienne Balibar, Roger Establet, Pierre Macherey and Jacques Ranci\u00e8re (1965) Focus on these 3 extracts from Reading Capital Louis Althusser on “Symptomatic reading,” from Reading\u00a0Capital, Part One, pages 9-28. Louis Althusser on “Historical… Continue Reading Focus on these 3 extracts from Reading Capital<\/em><\/h1>\n
Commentaries and Reactions<\/h1>\n
Additional References (a selection of commentaries pro et contra)<\/h1>\n