{"id":29,"date":"2019-08-30T12:44:52","date_gmt":"2019-08-30T16:44:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/?page_id=29"},"modified":"2020-05-12T12:21:59","modified_gmt":"2020-05-12T16:21:59","slug":"11-13","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/11-13\/","title":{"rendered":"11\/13 | Edward Said, <em>Orientalism<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this and the following sessions of Critique 13\/13 were\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/covid-19-critique-13-13-suspended\/\">suspended<\/a>. Please read the <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/bernard-e-harcourt-introduction-to-critique-11-13-on-edward-saids-orientalism\/\">introduction to Critique 11\/13 here<\/a>.\u00a0<\/span><\/h1>\n<h3><\/h3>\n<h3><\/h3>\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/11-13\/unnamed-16\/#main\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-963\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-963 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/files\/2020\/03\/unnamed-16-300x125.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"586\" height=\"244\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/files\/2020\/03\/unnamed-16-300x125.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/files\/2020\/03\/unnamed-16.jpg 484w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 586px) 100vw, 586px\" \/><\/a><\/h3>\n<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\">Professors\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/118-2\/\">Homi Bhabha<\/a>\u00a0and <a href=\"https:\/\/cgt.columbia.edu\/about\/people\/committee-faculty\/bernard-e-harcourt\/\">Bernard E. Harcourt<\/a><\/h1>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\">read and discuss<\/h2>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>Orientalism <\/em>and\u00a0<em>After the Last Sky\u00a0<\/em>by Edward Said<\/h2>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\">at the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.maisonfrancaise.org\/contact-and-directions\">Maison Fran\u00e7aise<\/a>,\u00a0Columbia University<\/h2>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><del><strong>Wednesday, March 11, 2020\u00a0<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/del><\/h2>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><del>6:15 \u2013 8:45 pm<\/del><\/h2>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\">For readings, please <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/critique-11-13-readings\/\">click here<\/a><\/h2>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\">~~~<\/h3>\n<p>In many ways, Edward Said\u2019s book <em>Orientalism<\/em>\u00a0remains today as vital and vibrant as it was when published in 1978. <em>Orientalism<\/em>\u00a0offers a timeless historical analysis of the way in which the scholars, writers, and specialists of the Orient created an imaginary of the Oriental, and later the Arab, which served to help shape their own identity as Europeans, to justify their imperial conquests, and to help them control and dominate the colonies. Said\u2019s writings analyze the way that knowledge operates as a cultural tool and a political weapon. Knowledge, Said argued, has material effects of reality: It shapes the conception of self and of the other\u2014and it does so through a back-and-forth, a mutually constitutive act, that constructs an idea of the other as it shapes a conception of the self.<\/p>\n<p>European culture thrived on the epistemological construction of the Orient. In Said\u2019s words, \u201cEuropean culture gained in strength and identity by setting itself off against the Orient as a sort of surrogate and even underground self.\u201d Building on but simultaneously against Nietzsche\u2019s view of truth as illusions and Foucault\u2019s theory of knowledge-power, Said crafted a sharp critique of the West as dependent on this recurring othering of Orientals and Arabs. \u201cTruths are illusions that we have forgotten are illusions\u201d: these famous words may sound too nihilistic to some, Said emphasized, but those words of Nietzsche \u201cdraw attention to the fact that so far as it existed in the West\u2019s awareness, the Orient was a word which later accrued to it a wide field of meanings, associations, and connotations, and that these did not necessarily refer to the real Orient but to the field surrounding the word.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Yes, indeed, that was true of the Orient for Europeans especially. And tragically, it is equally true today for the construction of the category of Muslims for many Americans.\u00a0One can hardly imagine, in our current political climate in the United States, a timelier critical intervention than Said\u2019s writings on orientalism as a way to capture the demonization of Muslims today\u2014as well as Latinos and immigrants\u2014as a vehicle to produce an imaginary American identity. When a Republican presidential candidate, later president of the United States, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/2019\/03\/15\/short-history-president-trumps-anti-muslim-bigotry\/\">declares<\/a> that \u201cIslam hates us\u201d and that \u201cwe have a problem in this country; it\u2019s called Muslims,\u201d we are right back, smack in the middle of Said\u2019s writings on orientalism.<\/p>\n<p>So much so, in fact, that in this seminar series dedicated to actualizing and deploying critical texts, it is almost as if Said\u2019s writings on orientalism are too fresh to need rejuvenation.<\/p>\n<p>Said presciently foresaw how the \u201cArab Muslim\u201d would become a key trope in American culture, government, and public policy. Muslims, Said predicted, would be viewed more and more as increasingly menacing, bloodthirsty, and dishonest in our new geopolitical configuration. It is almost as if Said foresaw, writing in 1978, the tragic aftermath of 9\/11. It is almost as if he prophesied our new counterinsurgency warfare paradigm of governing built on the fabrication, from whole cloth, of internal enemies\u2014what I call <em>The Counterrevolution<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Our ambition in this seminar is to return to critical texts in order to rethink our present political struggles. And so, since Said\u2019s epistemological project remains as vital and vibrant as when it was written, \u00a0then how shall we deploy this remarkable work and where shall we direct our conversation?<\/p>\n<p>Let me propose that we reflect on <em>praxis<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>Orientalism<\/em> itself ended not so much on praxis, as with epistemology. \u201cIf this book has any future use,\u201d Said concluded in 1978, \u201cit will be as a modest contribution to th[e] challenge [to the worldwide hegemony of Orientalism], and as a warning: that systems of thought like Orientalism, discourses of power, ideological fictions\u2014mind-forg\u2019d manacles\u2014are all too easily made, applied, and guarded\u2026. If the knowledge of Orientalism has any meaning, it is in being a reminder of the seductive degradation of knowledge, of any knowledge, anywhere, at any time. Now perhaps more than before.\u201d Now perhaps more than ever, one might add.<\/p>\n<p>But what does one do, exactly, with that knowledge? To be sure, the critical unveiling is itself a form of praxis, but it must also serve as a prolegomenon to praxis. How can we deploy or rethink today, for our contemporary political struggles, the many insights that we discover in Said\u2019s writings?<\/p>\n<p>To engage this conversation, I am delighted to welcome\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/118-2\/\">Homi K. Bhabha<\/a>, a dear friend and a colleague to the 13\/13 series and one of the world\u2019s leading critical thinkers. The Anne F. Rothenberg Professor of English and American Literature and Language at Harvard University, Homi Bhabha is the author of numerous works exploring colonial and postcolonial theory, cultural change and power, and cosmopolitanism, including <em>Nation and Narration<\/em> and <em>The Location of Culture<\/em>, which was reprinted as a Routledge Classic in 2004.<\/p>\n<p>We are delighted to be joined at Critique 11\/13 by Homi Bhabha.<\/p>\n<p>Welcome to Critique 11\/13!\u00a0<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/E6AECFEE-3FEA-444E-96B4-7CA792599A63#_ednref1\" name=\"_edn1\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_964\" style=\"width: 526px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/11-13\/030913_silkroad_091-jpg\/#main\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-964\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-964\" class=\" wp-image-964\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/files\/2020\/03\/homi-bhabha-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"516\" height=\"344\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/files\/2020\/03\/homi-bhabha-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/files\/2020\/03\/homi-bhabha.jpg 605w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 516px) 100vw, 516px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-964\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Jon Chase\/Harvard Staff Photographer<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>[Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/bernard-e-harcourt-introduction-to-critique-11-13-on-edward-saids-orientalism\/\">here<\/a>. \u00a9 Bernard E. Harcourt]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this and the following sessions of Critique 13\/13 were\u00a0suspended. Please read the introduction to Critique 11\/13 here.\u00a0 Professors\u00a0Homi Bhabha\u00a0and Bernard E. Harcourt read and discuss Orientalism and\u00a0After the Last Sky\u00a0by Edward Said at the Maison&hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/11-13\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue Reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1603,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-29","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/29","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1603"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/29\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/critique1313\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}