{"id":720,"date":"2011-03-22T08:55:29","date_gmt":"2011-03-22T13:55:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?p=720"},"modified":"2012-01-31T15:16:12","modified_gmt":"2012-01-31T20:16:12","slug":"fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2011\/03\/22\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\/","title":{"rendered":"Fukushima Daiichi and the Kyoto Protocol"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

by Daniel Firger
\nAssociate Director<\/p>\n

As a result of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami and the ongoing crisis<\/a> at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, speculation is mounting that Japan will be unable to meet its greenhouse gas emission (GHG) reduction targets under the Kyoto Protocol and may declare <\/a>\u201cforce majeure,\u201d effectively denouncing the treaty which bears the name of its historic capital city.<\/p>\n

This speculation is overwrought. For any number of reasons, both legal and political, Japan has no need to take such a dramatic and public step.<\/p>\n

This is not to say that the Fukushima nuclear disaster will leave international climate diplomacy entirely unaffected. With COP-17 just eight months away<\/a>, safety concerns about nuclear power plants are calling many nations<\/a>\u2019 emissions reduction commitments into question. But on the question of Japan\u2019s treaty obligations, we must bear in mind at least three observations:<\/p>\n

First, and most importantly, Japan has already indicated in no uncertain terms that it will not be a party to renewal of the Kyoto Protocol, which is set to expire<\/a> in 2012. Throwing the December 2010 Cancun climate talks into a temporary tailspin, Japanese negotiators made it clear early on that the country would refuse<\/a> to sign up for a second commitment period under the existing treaty framework. They argued that the exclusion of China and the United States rendered the agreement fundamentally unfair, and won out: the Cancun Agreements reflect<\/a> a new consensus that future climate change diplomacy, to be successful, will have to prioritize actions by the world\u2019s top two emitters.<\/p>\n

Even before the March 11 earthquake and tsunami, then, Japan was on record opposing the extension of Kyoto in its current form. Since the first commitment period will soon come to a close, Japan has little need to noisily withdraw from the treaty.<\/p>\n

Second, Japan need not make a \u201cforce majeure\u201d argument \u2013 \u201crebus sic stantibus<\/a>\u201d <\/em>(changed circumstances) under international law \u2013 in order to exit from the Kyoto Protocol. Both the Protocol and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) contain express provisions on withdrawal (KP article 27<\/a>; UNFCC article 25<\/a>). These allow states to unilaterally withdraw from the climate treaty and its protocol without justifying their conduct to other treaty parties.<\/p>\n

Like the justifications necessary to effectively declare \u201cforce majeure\u201d <\/em>in the private law context, the doctrine of \u201crebus sic stantibus\u201d is somewhat controversial under public international law, since \u201crecognition of a changed circumstances doctrine would be subject to rampant abuse and would undermine the international legal system\u2019s commitment to treaty compliance,\u201d (known to international lawyers as the principle of \u201cpacta sunt servanta\u201d) [1]<\/a>. Indeed, although codified in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (PDF)<\/a> in 1969, \u201cthere has never been a successful assertion of the doctrine in a court case and no clear example of its successful use diplomatic exchanges\u201d [2]<\/a>. With no real obstacle to a unilateral withdrawal, Japanese diplomats are unlikely to use Fukushima as a legal justification for the country\u2019s non-compliance with Kyoto.<\/p>\n

Finally, it is important to distinguish between a legal justification and a political excuse, and between a treaty withdrawal and a treaty breach. Although Japan is unlikely to withdraw from Kyoto and is even more unlikely to make a \u201cforce majeure\u201d argument to justify such a withdrawal, the country may still use the Fukushima disaster to explain, and provide political cover for, its failure to meet its Kyoto Protocol targets. As Laurence Helfer explained in his 2005 Virginia Law Review article, \u201cExiting Treaties<\/a>,\u201d quitting a treaty is vastly different from failing to meet a state\u2019s international law obligations. Although internationally lawful, the very public and affirmative act of treaty renunciation can, perhaps counterintuitively, yield more serious political consequences than an outright breach.<\/p>\n

Especially in the context of climate change diplomacy, where some states are on track to exceed their Kyoto Protocol emissions reduction targets and therefore violate the express terms of the treaty, \u201cexit\u201d seems to be less politically palatable than \u201cbreach,\u201d even for a country like Japan where recent events would provide an acceptable justification for its withdrawal from Kyoto.<\/p>\n

All in all, it is too soon to tell what impact Fukushima will have on the Kyoto Protocol\u2019s post-2012 successor regime. It seems likely, however, that newfound nuclear skepticism in Europe, China, and elsewhere will lead, at least in the near term, to greater reliance on fossil fuels<\/a>. And this will make it all the more difficult to meet the stringent cuts in GHGs required to avoid \u201cdangerous anthropogenic interference\u201d with the Earth\u2019s climate system. For now, as in 1997 during the Kyoto Protocol negotiations, all eyes are on Japan.<\/p>\n

—
\n[1] Laurence Helfer, “Exiting Treaties<\/a>,” 91 Va. L. Rev. 1579, 1643 (2005).
\n[2] Id.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Daniel Firger Associate Director As a result of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami and the ongoing crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, speculation is mounting that Japan will be unable to meet its greenhouse gas emission (GHG) reduction targets under the Kyoto Protocol and may declare \u201cforce majeure,\u201d effectively denouncing the treaty […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":580,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5680,5671],"tags":[5664],"class_list":{"0":"post-720","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-clean-energy","7":"category-international","8":"tag-climate-negotiations","9":"czr-hentry"},"yoast_head":"\nFukushima Daiichi and the Kyoto Protocol - Climate Law Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2011\/03\/22\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fukushima Daiichi and the Kyoto Protocol - Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"by Daniel Firger Associate Director As a result of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami and the ongoing crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, speculation is mounting that Japan will be unable to meet its greenhouse gas emission (GHG) reduction targets under the Kyoto Protocol and may declare \u201cforce majeure,\u201d effectively denouncing the treaty […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2011\/03\/22\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-22T13:55:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-01-31T20:16:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Daniel Firger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Daniel Firger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2011\\\/03\\\/22\\\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2011\\\/03\\\/22\\\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Daniel Firger\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8ae1fcab1bafe39a4a76017696d6db7\"},\"headline\":\"Fukushima Daiichi and the Kyoto Protocol\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-22T13:55:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-01-31T20:16:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2011\\\/03\\\/22\\\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":780,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"International Negotiations\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Clean Energy\",\"International\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2011\\\/03\\\/22\\\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2011\\\/03\\\/22\\\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\\\/\",\"name\":\"Fukushima Daiichi and the Kyoto Protocol - Climate Law Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-22T13:55:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-01-31T20:16:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2011\\\/03\\\/22\\\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2011\\\/03\\\/22\\\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2011\\\/03\\\/22\\\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fukushima Daiichi and the Kyoto Protocol\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Law Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"width\":2752,\"height\":260,\"caption\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/sabincenter\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8ae1fcab1bafe39a4a76017696d6db7\",\"name\":\"Daniel Firger\",\"description\":\"Associate Director and Fellow, Center for Climate Change Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/author\\\/dfirge\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fukushima Daiichi and the Kyoto Protocol - Climate Law Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2011\/03\/22\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fukushima Daiichi and the Kyoto Protocol - Climate Law Blog","og_description":"by Daniel Firger Associate Director As a result of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami and the ongoing crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, speculation is mounting that Japan will be unable to meet its greenhouse gas emission (GHG) reduction targets under the Kyoto Protocol and may declare \u201cforce majeure,\u201d effectively denouncing the treaty […]","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2011\/03\/22\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\/","og_site_name":"Climate Law Blog","article_published_time":"2011-03-22T13:55:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-01-31T20:16:12+00:00","author":"Daniel Firger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@sabincenter","twitter_site":"@sabincenter","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Daniel Firger","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2011\/03\/22\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2011\/03\/22\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\/"},"author":{"name":"Daniel Firger","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/c8ae1fcab1bafe39a4a76017696d6db7"},"headline":"Fukushima Daiichi and the Kyoto Protocol","datePublished":"2011-03-22T13:55:29+00:00","dateModified":"2012-01-31T20:16:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2011\/03\/22\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\/"},"wordCount":780,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"keywords":["International Negotiations"],"articleSection":["Clean Energy","International"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2011\/03\/22\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2011\/03\/22\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\/","name":"Fukushima Daiichi and the Kyoto Protocol - Climate Law Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-22T13:55:29+00:00","dateModified":"2012-01-31T20:16:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2011\/03\/22\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2011\/03\/22\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2011\/03\/22\/fukushima-daiichi-and-the-kyoto-protocol\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fukushima Daiichi and the Kyoto Protocol"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","name":"Climate Law Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization","name":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","width":2752,"height":260,"caption":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/sabincenter"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/c8ae1fcab1bafe39a4a76017696d6db7","name":"Daniel Firger","description":"Associate Director and Fellow, Center for Climate Change Law","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/author\/dfirge\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/580"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/720\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}