{"id":6888,"date":"2020-06-01T14:06:51","date_gmt":"2020-06-01T19:06:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?p=6888"},"modified":"2020-06-01T14:06:51","modified_gmt":"2020-06-01T19:06:51","slug":"doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2020\/06\/01\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\/","title":{"rendered":"DOE Proposal to Categorically Exclude Natural Gas Exports is Fatally Flawed"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Romany Webb and Hillary Aidun<\/em><\/p>\n

On Monday, June 1, the Sabin Center submitted comments<\/a> opposing a Department of Energy (DOE) proposal<\/a> to categorically exclude natural gas export approvals from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA\u2019s implementing regulations<\/a> allow federal agencies to categorically exclude actions if, and only if, they \u201cdo not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.\u201d As we explain in our comments, DOE has not undertaken sufficient analysis to determine whether natural gas export approvals meet that requirement. In its proposal, DOE claims that the \u201ctransportation of [exported] natural gas by marine vessel normally does not [have] significant environmental impacts,\u201d but ignores other ways in which natural gas exports may impact the environment. Most notably, DOE ignores impacts associated with induced natural gas production and use, both of which result in significant greenhouse gas emissions that must be considered under NEPA.<\/p>\n

DOE claims that it is not required to consider the greenhouse gas emissions associated with upstream natural gas production and downstream use because it has \u201cno authority to prevent\u201d those emissions. However, as we explain in our comments, that is not the correct test. The courts have made clear that an agency\u2019s obligation to consider reasonably foreseeable downstream emissions turns on whether it has legal authority to act on information about those emissions. DOE has such authority when approving natural gas exports. Indeed, as DOE has itself recognized, its approval decision must be based on a consideration of upstream and downstream environmental impacts (among other things). DOE has, therefore, previously analyzed upstream and downstream impacts as part of its environmental review of natural gas export approvals. DOE now claims that such analysis is not required, but nevertheless points to estimates of lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with natural gas exports, which it says show that the use of exported natural gas in Europe and Asia will not increase emissions. As we explain, however, the estimates are fatally flawed because they significantly underestimate methane emissions during natural gas production and improperly fail to account for the rise of renewable energy in overseas markets.<\/p>\n

As well as failing to consider key environmental impacts, DOE has also impermissibly segmented natural gas exports approvals from other connected actions, such as the approval of export terminals, which falls under the authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). As we explain, because the DOE and FERC actions are connected, they must be analyzed together in a single environmental impact statement. DOE\u2019s proposed categorical exclusion for export approvals would prevent this and thus inappropriately limit the scope of review under NEPA.<\/p>\n

Read our full letter to DOE here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Romany Webb and Hillary Aidun On Monday, June 1, the Sabin Center submitted comments opposing a Department of Energy (DOE) proposal to categorically exclude natural gas export approvals from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA\u2019s implementing regulations allow federal agencies to categorically exclude actions if, and only if, they \u201cdo […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1889,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5680,9338,5676],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-6888","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-clean-energy","7":"category-natural-gas","8":"category-nepa","9":"czr-hentry"},"yoast_head":"\nDOE Proposal to Categorically Exclude Natural Gas Exports is Fatally Flawed - Climate Law Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2020\/06\/01\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"DOE Proposal to Categorically Exclude Natural Gas Exports is Fatally Flawed - Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By Romany Webb and Hillary Aidun On Monday, June 1, the Sabin Center submitted comments opposing a Department of Energy (DOE) proposal to categorically exclude natural gas export approvals from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA\u2019s implementing regulations allow federal agencies to categorically exclude actions if, and only if, they \u201cdo […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2020\/06\/01\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-06-01T19:06:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Romany Webb\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Romany Webb\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/01\\\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/01\\\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Romany Webb\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/86e27971af7ed1ad597bed3bc0fa541e\"},\"headline\":\"DOE Proposal to Categorically Exclude Natural Gas Exports is Fatally Flawed\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-01T19:06:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/01\\\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":457,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Clean Energy\",\"Natural Gas\",\"NEPA\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/01\\\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/01\\\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\\\/\",\"name\":\"DOE Proposal to Categorically Exclude Natural Gas Exports is Fatally Flawed - Climate Law Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-01T19:06:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/01\\\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/01\\\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/01\\\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"DOE Proposal to Categorically Exclude Natural Gas Exports is Fatally Flawed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Law Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"width\":2752,\"height\":260,\"caption\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/sabincenter\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/86e27971af7ed1ad597bed3bc0fa541e\",\"name\":\"Romany Webb\",\"description\":\"Romany Webb is a Research Scholar at Columbia Law School, Adjunct Associate Professor of Climate at Columbia Climate School, and Deputy Director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/author\\\/rwebb\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DOE Proposal to Categorically Exclude Natural Gas Exports is Fatally Flawed - Climate Law Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2020\/06\/01\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"DOE Proposal to Categorically Exclude Natural Gas Exports is Fatally Flawed - Climate Law Blog","og_description":"By Romany Webb and Hillary Aidun On Monday, June 1, the Sabin Center submitted comments opposing a Department of Energy (DOE) proposal to categorically exclude natural gas export approvals from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA\u2019s implementing regulations allow federal agencies to categorically exclude actions if, and only if, they \u201cdo […]","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2020\/06\/01\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\/","og_site_name":"Climate Law Blog","article_published_time":"2020-06-01T19:06:51+00:00","author":"Romany Webb","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@sabincenter","twitter_site":"@sabincenter","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Romany Webb","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2020\/06\/01\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2020\/06\/01\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\/"},"author":{"name":"Romany Webb","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/86e27971af7ed1ad597bed3bc0fa541e"},"headline":"DOE Proposal to Categorically Exclude Natural Gas Exports is Fatally Flawed","datePublished":"2020-06-01T19:06:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2020\/06\/01\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\/"},"wordCount":457,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Clean Energy","Natural Gas","NEPA"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2020\/06\/01\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2020\/06\/01\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\/","name":"DOE Proposal to Categorically Exclude Natural Gas Exports is Fatally Flawed - Climate Law Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-06-01T19:06:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2020\/06\/01\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2020\/06\/01\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2020\/06\/01\/doe-proposal-to-categorically-exclude-natural-gas-exports-is-fatally-flawed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"DOE Proposal to Categorically Exclude Natural Gas Exports is Fatally Flawed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","name":"Climate Law Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization","name":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","width":2752,"height":260,"caption":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/sabincenter"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/86e27971af7ed1ad597bed3bc0fa541e","name":"Romany Webb","description":"Romany Webb is a Research Scholar at Columbia Law School, Adjunct Associate Professor of Climate at Columbia Climate School, and Deputy Director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/author\/rwebb\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6888","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1889"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6888"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6888\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}