{"id":6617,"date":"2019-12-02T08:41:53","date_gmt":"2019-12-02T13:41:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?p=6617"},"modified":"2019-12-02T10:25:25","modified_gmt":"2019-12-02T15:25:25","slug":"epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/","title":{"rendered":"EPA Proposal to Rescind Oil and Gas Methane Regulations Has Not Been Adequately Justified and Disregards Negative Climate Impacts"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p><em>By Romany Webb<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2019\/12\/pump-4257448_1280.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-6620 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2019\/12\/pump-4257448_1280.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"339\" height=\"230\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2019\/12\/pump-4257448_1280.jpg 755w, https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2019\/12\/pump-4257448_1280-300x203.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 339px) 100vw, 339px\" \/><\/a>On Friday, November 22, the Sabin Center submitted <a href=\"https:\/\/climate.law.columbia.edu\/sites\/default\/files\/content\/%5bFINAL%5d%20Sabin%20Center%20Comments%20-%20Proposed%20Changes%20to%20Oil%20and%20Gas%20NSPS%20%5b11-22-19%5d.pdf\">comments<\/a> opposing an Environmental Protection Agency (\u201cEPA\u201d) <a href=\"https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/FR-2019-09-24\/pdf\/2019-19876.pdf\">proposal<\/a> to rescind <a href=\"https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/FR-2016-06-03\/pdf\/2016-11971.pdf\">regulations<\/a> limiting methane emissions from new oil and natural gas facilities (the \u201cMethane New Source Performance Standards\u201d or \u201cMethane NSPS\u201d). The primary component of natural gas, methane is emitted throughout the oil and gas production process, primarily through accidental leaks and intentional venting. The emissions make a significant contribution to climate change because methane is a highly potent greenhouse gas which, in the first 20 years after it is released, traps approximately 84 times more heat in the earth\u2019s atmosphere than carbon dioxide (on a per ton basis). Methane also contributes to the formation of ground-level ozone which is itself a heat-trapping greenhouse gas and, when inhaled by humans, can trigger a variety of health problems from throat irritation and coughing to bronchitis, asthma, and reduced lung function.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Recognizing the environmental and public health risks posed by methane, in January 2015, the Obama administration set a <a href=\"https:\/\/obamawhitehouse.archives.gov\/the-press-office\/2015\/01\/14\/fact-sheet-administration-takes-steps-forward-climate-action-plan-anno-1\">goal<\/a> of reducing emissions from the oil and gas industry by 40 to 45 percent below 2012 levels by 2025. That goal was to be achieved, in part, through stricter regulation of methane emissions under section 111 of the Clean Air Act (\u201cCAA\u201d) (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/USCODE-2010-title42\/pdf\/USCODE-2010-title42-chap85-subchapI-partA-sec7411.pdf\">42 U.S.C. \u00a7 7411<\/a>). Briefly, section 111 of the CAA requires EPA to regulate stationary sources that \u201ccause[], or contribute[] significantly to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare\u201d (\u201cdangerous air pollution\u201d). Section 111(b) provides for the adoption, by EPA, of NSPS for new and modified stationary sources of dangerous air pollution. Once NSPS are adopted with respect to a particular type of stationary source, EPA is required, under section 111(d), to issue regulations controlling emissions from existing sources of the same type (subject to limited exceptions).<\/p>\n<p>Acting pursuant to section 111(b) of the CAA, EPA finalized the methane NSPS in June 2016. At the same time, EPA also issued an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/sites\/production\/files\/2016-11\/documents\/oil-natural-gas-icr-supporting-statement-epa-icr-2548-01.pdf\">information request<\/a> to oil and gas companies, seeking data needed to develop regulations for existing facilities under section 111(d). That request was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/controlling-air-pollution-oil-and-natural-gas-industry\/background-information-request-oil-and\">withdrawn<\/a> by the Trump administration in March 2017. The following month, at President Trump\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/presidential-actions\/presidential-executive-order-promoting-energy-independence-economic-growth\/\">direction<\/a>, EPA commenced a review of the methane NSPS. As <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2018\/09\/11\/five-important-points-about-epas-revised-new-source-performance-standards-for-the-oil-and-gas-industry\/\">previously reported<\/a> on this blog, EPA initially proposed revising the methane NSPS to, among other things, weaken the leak detection and reporting requirements therein. Now, EPA is proposing to go even further, and entirely rescind the methane NSPS. That would have far reaching consequences, eliminating the methane controls currently imposed on new and modified facilities, and obviating the need for EPA to adopt new controls for existing facilities. (It should be noted that, while new oil and gas facilities would remain subject to NSPS for volatile organic compound (\u201cVOC\u201d) emissions, those standards do not trigger regulation of existing sources under section 111(d). That is because section 111(d) only applies to air pollutants for which air quality criteria have not been issued or which are not subject to National Ambient Air Quality Standards (\u201cNAAQS\u201d). Because VOCs are precursors to ozone and particulate matter, for which NAAQS have been established, the adoption of VOC standards does not trigger section 111(d).)<\/p>\n<p>EPA\u2019s purported justifications for rescinding the methane NSPS do not withstand scrutiny. As explained in our comments:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Section 111(b) directs EPA to promulgate NSPS for categories of stationary source that have been found to cause or contribute to dangerous air pollution. EPA claims that such a finding has only been made with respect to oil and natural gas production and processing facilities. Thus, in EPA\u2019s view, the methane NSPS cannot be applied to transmission and storage facilities. That view is, however, refuted by EPA\u2019s own documents. The documents clearly show that, when EPA listed \u201cCrude Oil and Natural Gas Production\u201d as a source category under section 111(b), it intended to capture the entire oil and natural gas industry. EPA has, until now, consistently interpreted the listing decision as applying industry-wide. EPA has offered no explanation for its sudden change in approach.<\/li>\n<li>EPA also erroneously asserts that the methane NSPS is unnecessary because oil and gas facilities are subject to other standards (e.g., governing VOCs) and steps taken to comply with those standards will also reduce methane emissions. Just three years ago, however, EPA concluded that the existence of other standards does not eliminate the need for the methane NSPS. In fact, EPA determined that the extent of methane emissions from the oil and gas industry, and the risks posed by those emissions, rendered adoption of the NSPS both necessary and appropriate.<\/li>\n<li>EPA has sought to downplay the need for the methane NSPS, and equivalent regulations targeting existing facilities, including by including by arguing that companies have \u201cmarket incentives\u201d to reduce methane emissions by capturing natural gas. That is not always the case, however. Transmission pipeline operators, for example, pass the cost of lost gas onto shippers and thus face no financial pressure to reduce losses. (See our previous blog on the topic <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2017\/07\/17\/another-hole-in-methane-regulation-the-need-for-stricter-controls-on-gas-pipeline-leaks\/\">here<\/a>.) Other operators who would benefit financially from reducing losses are often reluctant to invest in gas capture systems, e.g., because of the high upfront cost of such systems. State regulations often do not require the use of such systems.<\/li>\n<li>Finally, while EPA acknowledges that rescinding the methane NSPS would increase emissions, it devalues the climate impacts of that increase. To value the impacts, EPA uses a domestic-only social cost of methane, which accounts solely for climate change impacts within the U.S. EPA ignores impacts occurring overseas, despite having previously admitted that such impacts \u201cwill also have relevant consequences on the U.S. and our citizens.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Click <a href=\"https:\/\/climate.law.columbia.edu\/sites\/default\/files\/content\/%5bFINAL%5d%20Sabin%20Center%20Comments%20-%20Proposed%20Changes%20to%20Oil%20and%20Gas%20NSPS%20%5b11-22-19%5d.pdf\">here<\/a> to read our comment letter in full. Further information about EPA\u2019s methane NSPS is available <a href=\"https:\/\/climate.law.columbia.edu\/content\/regulation-database-oil-and-gas-sector\">here<\/a>. Other federal regulations targeting methane emissions from the oil and gas industry are discussed <a href=\"https:\/\/climate.law.columbia.edu\/content\/regulation-database-bureau-land-management\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Romany Webb On Friday, November 22, the Sabin Center submitted comments opposing an Environmental Protection Agency (\u201cEPA\u201d) proposal to rescind regulations limiting methane emissions from new oil and natural gas facilities (the \u201cMethane New Source Performance Standards\u201d or \u201cMethane NSPS\u201d). The primary component of natural gas, methane is emitted throughout the oil and gas [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1889,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5677,5680,9485,8460,9482,9338,63639],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-6617","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-clean-air-act","7":"category-clean-energy","8":"category-deregulation","9":"category-epa","10":"category-methane","11":"category-natural-gas","12":"category-oil","13":"czr-hentry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>EPA Proposal to Rescind Oil and Gas Methane Regulations Has Not Been Adequately Justified and Disregards Negative Climate Impacts - Climate Law Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"EPA Proposal to Rescind Oil and Gas Methane Regulations Has Not Been Adequately Justified and Disregards Negative Climate Impacts - Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By Romany Webb On Friday, November 22, the Sabin Center submitted comments opposing an Environmental Protection Agency (\u201cEPA\u201d) proposal to rescind regulations limiting methane emissions from new oil and natural gas facilities (the \u201cMethane New Source Performance Standards\u201d or \u201cMethane NSPS\u201d). The primary component of natural gas, methane is emitted throughout the oil and gas [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-12-02T13:41:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-12-02T15:25:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2019\/12\/pump-4257448_1280.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Romany Webb\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Romany Webb\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Romany Webb\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/86e27971af7ed1ad597bed3bc0fa541e\"},\"headline\":\"EPA Proposal to Rescind Oil and Gas Methane Regulations Has Not Been Adequately Justified and Disregards Negative Climate Impacts\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-02T13:41:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-12-02T15:25:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":988,\"commentCount\":2,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/pump-4257448_1280.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Clean Air Act\",\"Clean Energy\",\"Deregulation\",\"EPA\",\"Methane\",\"Natural Gas\",\"Oil\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\\\/\",\"name\":\"EPA Proposal to Rescind Oil and Gas Methane Regulations Has Not Been Adequately Justified and Disregards Negative Climate Impacts - Climate Law Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/pump-4257448_1280.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-02T13:41:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-12-02T15:25:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/pump-4257448_1280.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/pump-4257448_1280.jpg\",\"width\":755,\"height\":512},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"EPA Proposal to Rescind Oil and Gas Methane Regulations Has Not Been Adequately Justified and Disregards Negative Climate Impacts\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Law Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"width\":2752,\"height\":260,\"caption\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/sabincenter\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/86e27971af7ed1ad597bed3bc0fa541e\",\"name\":\"Romany Webb\",\"description\":\"Romany Webb is a Research Scholar at Columbia Law School, Adjunct Associate Professor of Climate at Columbia Climate School, and Deputy Director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/author\\\/rwebb\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"EPA Proposal to Rescind Oil and Gas Methane Regulations Has Not Been Adequately Justified and Disregards Negative Climate Impacts - Climate Law Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"EPA Proposal to Rescind Oil and Gas Methane Regulations Has Not Been Adequately Justified and Disregards Negative Climate Impacts - Climate Law Blog","og_description":"By Romany Webb On Friday, November 22, the Sabin Center submitted comments opposing an Environmental Protection Agency (\u201cEPA\u201d) proposal to rescind regulations limiting methane emissions from new oil and natural gas facilities (the \u201cMethane New Source Performance Standards\u201d or \u201cMethane NSPS\u201d). The primary component of natural gas, methane is emitted throughout the oil and gas [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/","og_site_name":"Climate Law Blog","article_published_time":"2019-12-02T13:41:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-12-02T15:25:25+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2019\/12\/pump-4257448_1280.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Romany Webb","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@sabincenter","twitter_site":"@sabincenter","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Romany Webb","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/"},"author":{"name":"Romany Webb","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/86e27971af7ed1ad597bed3bc0fa541e"},"headline":"EPA Proposal to Rescind Oil and Gas Methane Regulations Has Not Been Adequately Justified and Disregards Negative Climate Impacts","datePublished":"2019-12-02T13:41:53+00:00","dateModified":"2019-12-02T15:25:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/"},"wordCount":988,"commentCount":2,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2019\/12\/pump-4257448_1280.jpg","articleSection":["Clean Air Act","Clean Energy","Deregulation","EPA","Methane","Natural Gas","Oil"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/","name":"EPA Proposal to Rescind Oil and Gas Methane Regulations Has Not Been Adequately Justified and Disregards Negative Climate Impacts - Climate Law Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2019\/12\/pump-4257448_1280.jpg","datePublished":"2019-12-02T13:41:53+00:00","dateModified":"2019-12-02T15:25:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2019\/12\/pump-4257448_1280.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2019\/12\/pump-4257448_1280.jpg","width":755,"height":512},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2019\/12\/02\/epa-proposal-to-rescind-oil-and-gas-methane-regulations-has-not-been-adequately-justified-and-disregards-negative-climate-impacts\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"EPA Proposal to Rescind Oil and Gas Methane Regulations Has Not Been Adequately Justified and Disregards Negative Climate Impacts"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","name":"Climate Law Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization","name":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","width":2752,"height":260,"caption":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/sabincenter"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/86e27971af7ed1ad597bed3bc0fa541e","name":"Romany Webb","description":"Romany Webb is a Research Scholar at Columbia Law School, Adjunct Associate Professor of Climate at Columbia Climate School, and Deputy Director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/author\/rwebb\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6617","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1889"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6617"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6617\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6617"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}