{"id":3128,"date":"2015-04-10T12:08:09","date_gmt":"2015-04-10T17:08:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?p=3128"},"modified":"2015-04-10T12:08:09","modified_gmt":"2015-04-10T17:08:09","slug":"judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge vacates coal mine expansion permit for failure to consider air pollution when coal is burned"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

Jennifer M. Klein, Esq.
\nAssociate Director & Fellow<\/p>\n

\"Coal_mine_Wyoming\"<\/a>A federal judge in Colorado has vacated a permit to expand a coal mine in New Mexico, finding that the agency approving the permit failed to consider the mercury pollution that would be released into the air when the coal is burned at a nearby power plant. While this case deals with the local environmental impacts of mercury pollution, it bears on federal agencies\u2019 obligation to consider the climate impacts of fossil fuel extraction.<\/p>\n

The Navajo Mine, located on a reservation in New Mexico, is the sole supplier of coal to the Four Corners Power Plant. In 2005, the mine operator, the Navajo Transitional Energy Company (NTEC)[1]<\/a>, sought to expand the mine\u2019s operations and submitted an application for a revised permit to the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM). Pursuant to its obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), OSM completed an Environmental Assessment (EA) for NTEC\u2019s permit revision application. OSM concluded that the proposed mine expansion would not have a significant impact on the environment and granted NTEC\u2019s application.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Two environmental organizations challenged the permit approval in federal court, and in 2010, the court remanded the application to OSM. NTEC submitted an application for a slightly more modest expansion of the Navajo Mine, and OSM again approved NTEC\u2019s application after issuing another final EA concluding that the expansion would not significantly impact the environment. OSM reached this conclusion despite the fact that the proposed expansion would allow the Four Corners Power Plant to burn an additional 12.7 million tons of coal over the life of its supply contract with NTEC.<\/p>\n

In 2012, environmental organizations once again challenged OSM\u2019s approval of the expansion. This March, Judge John L. Kane issued an order in the case, Din\u00e9 Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment et al. v. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement et al.<\/em>, No. 12-cv-1275 (JLK) (D. Colo.), finding that OSM\u2019s NEPA review was inadequate, because the agency had failed to consider the combustion-related effects of expanding the Navajo Mine as reasonably foreseeable indirect impacts of the mine expansion. Specifically, additional mercury from burning more coal at the Four Corners Power Plant could affect threatened and endangered species in the area. This month, Judge Kane issued an order vacating the permit while OSM once again reconsiders the environmental impacts of the mine expansion. Judge Kane stated that vacating the permit is necessary to ensure that compliance with NEPA does not \u201cbecome a mere bureaucratic formality.\u201d<\/p>\n

While Din\u00e9 <\/em>deals with the environmental impacts of mercury pollution, Judge Kane\u2019s logic should apply with equal force to greenhouse emissions from coal combustion. Where increased extraction of fossil fuels will predictably lead to combustion of those fossil fuels, the resulting emissions are a reasonably foreseeable indirect impact of the extraction and should be considered in environmental impact review. However, opponents of this theory will argue that the Navajo mine situation is unusual in that all its coal goes to a single power plant, and therefore its air pollution can readily be traced.<\/p>\n

NTEC has appealed the district court\u2019s decision, and the Sabin Center will continue to follow this case as it is considered by the United State Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.<\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> At the time of the challenged permit revision application, the Navajo Mine was leased by BHP Navajo Coal Company (BHP). NTEC purchased 100% of BHP\u2019s interests to the Navajo Mine in 2013.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jennifer M. Klein, Esq. Associate Director & Fellow A federal judge in Colorado has vacated a permit to expand a coal mine in New Mexico, finding that the agency approving the permit failed to consider the mercury pollution that would be released into the air when the coal is burned at a nearby power plant. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1434,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5673,9415,9411,5676],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-3128","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-litigation","7":"category-coal","8":"category-environmental-impact-review","9":"category-nepa","10":"czr-hentry"},"yoast_head":"\nJudge vacates coal mine expansion permit for failure to consider air pollution when coal is burned - Climate Law Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Judge vacates coal mine expansion permit for failure to consider air pollution when coal is burned - Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jennifer M. Klein, Esq. Associate Director & Fellow A federal judge in Colorado has vacated a permit to expand a coal mine in New Mexico, finding that the agency approving the permit failed to consider the mercury pollution that would be released into the air when the coal is burned at a nearby power plant. […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-04-10T17:08:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2015\/04\/Coal_mine_Wyoming-300x200.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jennifer Klein\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jennifer Klein\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/10\\\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/10\\\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jennifer Klein\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/feb003a23e39abcdba2d22ac5d5cf26f\"},\"headline\":\"Judge vacates coal mine expansion permit for failure to consider air pollution when coal is burned\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-04-10T17:08:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/10\\\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":592,\"commentCount\":1,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/10\\\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/Coal_mine_Wyoming-300x200.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Climate Litigation\",\"Coal\",\"Environmental Impact Review\",\"NEPA\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/10\\\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/10\\\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\\\/\",\"name\":\"Judge vacates coal mine expansion permit for failure to consider air pollution when coal is burned - Climate Law Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/10\\\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/10\\\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/Coal_mine_Wyoming-300x200.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-04-10T17:08:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/10\\\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/10\\\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/10\\\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/Coal_mine_Wyoming.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/Coal_mine_Wyoming.jpg\",\"width\":600,\"height\":400},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2015\\\/04\\\/10\\\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Judge vacates coal mine expansion permit for failure to consider air pollution when coal is burned\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Law Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"width\":2752,\"height\":260,\"caption\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/sabincenter\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/feb003a23e39abcdba2d22ac5d5cf26f\",\"name\":\"Jennifer Klein\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/author\\\/jklein4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Judge vacates coal mine expansion permit for failure to consider air pollution when coal is burned - Climate Law Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Judge vacates coal mine expansion permit for failure to consider air pollution when coal is burned - Climate Law Blog","og_description":"Jennifer M. Klein, Esq. Associate Director & Fellow A federal judge in Colorado has vacated a permit to expand a coal mine in New Mexico, finding that the agency approving the permit failed to consider the mercury pollution that would be released into the air when the coal is burned at a nearby power plant. […]","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/","og_site_name":"Climate Law Blog","article_published_time":"2015-04-10T17:08:09+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2015\/04\/Coal_mine_Wyoming-300x200.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Jennifer Klein","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@sabincenter","twitter_site":"@sabincenter","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jennifer Klein","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/"},"author":{"name":"Jennifer Klein","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/feb003a23e39abcdba2d22ac5d5cf26f"},"headline":"Judge vacates coal mine expansion permit for failure to consider air pollution when coal is burned","datePublished":"2015-04-10T17:08:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/"},"wordCount":592,"commentCount":1,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2015\/04\/Coal_mine_Wyoming-300x200.jpg","articleSection":["Climate Litigation","Coal","Environmental Impact Review","NEPA"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/","name":"Judge vacates coal mine expansion permit for failure to consider air pollution when coal is burned - Climate Law Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2015\/04\/Coal_mine_Wyoming-300x200.jpg","datePublished":"2015-04-10T17:08:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2015\/04\/Coal_mine_Wyoming.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2015\/04\/Coal_mine_Wyoming.jpg","width":600,"height":400},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2015\/04\/10\/judge-vacates-coal-mine-expansion-permit-for-failure-to-consider-air-pollution-when-coal-is-burned\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Judge vacates coal mine expansion permit for failure to consider air pollution when coal is burned"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","name":"Climate Law Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization","name":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","width":2752,"height":260,"caption":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/sabincenter"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/feb003a23e39abcdba2d22ac5d5cf26f","name":"Jennifer Klein","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/author\/jklein4\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3128","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1434"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3128"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3128\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3128"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3128"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3128"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}