{"id":284,"date":"2010-10-27T07:16:03","date_gmt":"2010-10-27T12:16:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?p=284"},"modified":"2012-01-31T15:27:08","modified_gmt":"2012-01-31T20:27:08","slug":"coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/27\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\/","title":{"rendered":"Coal Retirements v. Grid Reliability: Is Conflict Avoidable?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p>Daniel M. Firger<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.columbia.edu\/centers\/climatechange\/About\/contact\"><br \/>\n<\/a>Associate Director<\/p>\n<p>Clean air and water regulations expected in the near term from EPA may force up to 76 gigawatts of dirty fossil fuel-fired electricity generation capacity into retirement, according to a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nerc.com\/news_pr.php?npr=663\">new report<\/a> published on October 26, 2010 by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nerc.com\/index.php\">North American Electric Reliability Corporation<\/a> (NERC). The report is notable because it comes from NERC, an independent self-regulatory body made up of industry players, which under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ferc.gov\/whats-new\/comm-meet\/072006\/E-5.pdf\">authorized (<em>PDF<\/em>)<\/a> by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to enforce mandatory reliability standards for the nation\u2019s bulk power system.<\/p>\n<p>The NERC report examines just four EPA rules in its assessment:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>1. The <a href=\"https:\/\/water.epa.gov\/lawsregs\/lawsguidance\/cwa\/316b\/index.cfm\">Clean Water Act Section 316(b)<\/a>, Cooling Water Intake Structures;<\/p>\n<p>2. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/oar\/caa\/title1.html\">Title I of the Clean Air Act<\/a> \u2013 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the electric power industry (commonly referred to as the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Standard);<\/p>\n<p>3. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/airtransport\/\">Clean Air Transport Rule<\/a> (CATR); and<\/p>\n<p>4. Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Disposal <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/epawaste\/nonhaz\/industrial\/special\/fossil\/ccr-rule\/index.htm\">Regulations<\/a>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Importantly, NERC\u2019s assessment does <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">not<\/span> examine the impacts of adopting greenhouse gas (GHG) controls, either through federal legislation such as cap-and-trade or a renewable portfolio standard, or via EPA regulations promulgated under the Clean Air Act (CAA).\u00a0 Recent reports from investment bank <a href=\"https:\/\/op.bna.com\/env.nsf\/id\/jstn-8actja\/$File\/suisse.pdf\">Credit Suisse (<em>PDF<\/em>)<\/a> and research firm <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/0\/61af665a-dae0-11df-a5bb-00144feabdc0.html\">Sanford Bernstein<\/a> paint a similarly bleak picture for coal on the basis of conventional pollutant regulations alone, predicting that up to 1 in 5 coal-fired power plants will be mothballed over the coming decade due to tighter environmental standards.\u00a0 Factoring in climate-related measures (such as the BACT standards\u00a0that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/NSR\/documents\/20100413fs.pdf\">will apply (<em>PDF<\/em>)<\/a> to large stationary sources of GHGs beginning on January 2, 2011) may raise the estimates for likely coal retirements even higher.<\/p>\n<p>As clean air and climate regulations make coal more expensive to burn,   NERC is of course right to point out that grid reliability must remain a paramount   concern for both industry and policymakers.\u00a0 But a recent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mjbradley.com\/news_20100809_00.html\">report<\/a> by M.J. Bradley &amp; Associates, an energy consultancy, clearly explains that &#8220;existing power system capacity well in excess of minimum reserve levels&#8221; will allow for projected coal plant retirements without sacrificing reliability.\u00a0 Further, the report highlights a variety of reasons why such retirements may in fact <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">enhance<\/span> reliability:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[T]he retirement of some existing generating capacity will create room on the transmission grid to accommodate additional power flows, or new generating capacity, without requiring attendant upgrades in transmission, thus mitigating reliability concerns while reducing the cost of transitioning to a cleaner, more efficient generation fleet.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As America moves inexorably towards a cleaner energy mix, thoughtful planning and coordination between EPA,  FERC, DOE and state regulators will go a long way toward  avoiding problems as power generators retire old, dirty plants and switch fuels from coal to natural gas and renewables.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Daniel M. Firger Associate Director Clean air and water regulations expected in the near term from EPA may force up to 76 gigawatts of dirty fossil fuel-fired electricity generation capacity into retirement, according to a new report published on October 26, 2010 by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). The report is notable because [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":580,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5680,5681],"tags":[836],"class_list":{"0":"post-284","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-clean-energy","7":"category-grid","8":"tag-electricity-and-grid-issues","9":"czr-hentry"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Coal Retirements v. Grid Reliability: Is Conflict Avoidable? - Climate Law Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/27\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Coal Retirements v. Grid Reliability: Is Conflict Avoidable? - Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Daniel M. Firger Associate Director Clean air and water regulations expected in the near term from EPA may force up to 76 gigawatts of dirty fossil fuel-fired electricity generation capacity into retirement, according to a new report published on October 26, 2010 by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). The report is notable because [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/27\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-27T12:16:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-01-31T20:27:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Daniel Firger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Daniel Firger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/27\\\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/27\\\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Daniel Firger\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8ae1fcab1bafe39a4a76017696d6db7\"},\"headline\":\"Coal Retirements v. Grid Reliability: Is Conflict Avoidable?\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-27T12:16:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-01-31T20:27:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/27\\\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":463,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Power Grid\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Clean Energy\",\"Grid\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/27\\\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/27\\\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\\\/\",\"name\":\"Coal Retirements v. Grid Reliability: Is Conflict Avoidable? - Climate Law Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-27T12:16:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-01-31T20:27:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/27\\\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/27\\\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/27\\\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Coal Retirements v. Grid Reliability: Is Conflict Avoidable?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Law Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"width\":2752,\"height\":260,\"caption\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/sabincenter\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c8ae1fcab1bafe39a4a76017696d6db7\",\"name\":\"Daniel Firger\",\"description\":\"Associate Director and Fellow, Center for Climate Change Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/author\\\/dfirge\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Coal Retirements v. Grid Reliability: Is Conflict Avoidable? - Climate Law Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/27\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Coal Retirements v. Grid Reliability: Is Conflict Avoidable? - Climate Law Blog","og_description":"Daniel M. Firger Associate Director Clean air and water regulations expected in the near term from EPA may force up to 76 gigawatts of dirty fossil fuel-fired electricity generation capacity into retirement, according to a new report published on October 26, 2010 by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). The report is notable because [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/27\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\/","og_site_name":"Climate Law Blog","article_published_time":"2010-10-27T12:16:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-01-31T20:27:08+00:00","author":"Daniel Firger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@sabincenter","twitter_site":"@sabincenter","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Daniel Firger","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/27\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/27\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\/"},"author":{"name":"Daniel Firger","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/c8ae1fcab1bafe39a4a76017696d6db7"},"headline":"Coal Retirements v. Grid Reliability: Is Conflict Avoidable?","datePublished":"2010-10-27T12:16:03+00:00","dateModified":"2012-01-31T20:27:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/27\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\/"},"wordCount":463,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"keywords":["Power Grid"],"articleSection":["Clean Energy","Grid"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/27\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/27\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\/","name":"Coal Retirements v. Grid Reliability: Is Conflict Avoidable? - Climate Law Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-27T12:16:03+00:00","dateModified":"2012-01-31T20:27:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/27\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/27\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/27\/coal-retirements-v-grid-reliability-is-conflict-avoidable\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Coal Retirements v. Grid Reliability: Is Conflict Avoidable?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","name":"Climate Law Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization","name":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","width":2752,"height":260,"caption":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/sabincenter"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/c8ae1fcab1bafe39a4a76017696d6db7","name":"Daniel Firger","description":"Associate Director and Fellow, Center for Climate Change Law","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/author\/dfirge\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/284","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/580"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=284"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/284\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=284"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=284"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=284"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}