{"id":254,"date":"2010-10-12T11:15:53","date_gmt":"2010-10-12T16:15:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?p=254"},"modified":"2013-07-19T12:16:04","modified_gmt":"2013-07-19T17:16:04","slug":"federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/12\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal preemption issues for green building ordinances remain unresolved after recent AHRI ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

As part of the Center for Climate Change Law\u2019s efforts to continually improve its model municipal green building ordinance, CCCL has been tracking legal issues relevant to municipal green building ordinances. One major potential impediment to the successful implementation of a green building ordinance is preemption under federal law. While the preemption fears of green building proponents have yet to fully manifest, neither have they been fully dispelled by recent developments.<\/p>\n

In 2008, the Air Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI), a trade association, and other related plaintiffs challenged the City of Albuquerque\u2019s recently established green building code before the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico. In the case, Air Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute v. City of Albuquerque <\/em>(AHRI<\/em>), AHRI argued that the code is preempted by the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act and its amendments (EPCA), which regulates the energy efficiency of certain large appliances such as air conditioners and water heaters (42 U.S.C. \u00a7 6201,\u00a0et seq).<\/em> EPCA sets federal efficiency standards for these appliances and preempts more stringent state or municipal regulations to prevent a patchwork of state regulations.<\/p>\n

In an October 2008 decision, the district court found that AHRI\u2019s preemption claim had a substantial likelihood of success and granted a preliminary injunction preventing Albuquerque from implementing the code (AHRI<\/span>, 2008 WL 5586316 (D.N.M. 2008)).\u00a0This decision raised concerns: if AHRI\u2019s preemption claim succeeded on the merits, many state and municipal regulations concerning energy efficiency of covered products, including most green building ordinances, could also be preempted. Indeed, Washington state\u2019s newly enacted energy code has already been challenged on similar grounds<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Plaintiffs, seeking a permanent injunction, subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment. In a September 2010 ruling, the district court found the code\u2019s prescriptive provisions preempted as a matter of law. However, it denied the motion<\/a> with respect to the code\u2019s performance-based provisions, including one based on the U.S. Green Building Council\u2019s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standards (AHRI<\/span>, No. 08-633 (D.N.M. 2010),\u00a0available at prior link<\/em>).<\/p>\n

In denying the summary judgment motion with respect to the performance-based provisions of the code, the court noted that AHRI did not meet its prima facie burden to show an absence of genuine issues of material fact. Noting that AHRI\u2019s \u201ccursory\u201d argument presented \u201cvery few material facts,\u201d the court held that AHRI did not show facts demonstrating that the code\u2019s performance-based provisions are within EPCA\u2019s preemptive scope. In particular, the court noted that EPCA regulates products, while LEED is a building regulation. Thus, AHRI was required to identify particular provisions within LEED that concern the energy efficiency of products covered by EPCA. Instead, AHRI supported its argument by relying on the court\u2019s earlier preliminary injunction against the code\u2019s performance-based provisions. The court rejected this reasoning because the legal standard for a preliminary injunction is distinct from that for summary judgment; reciting the court\u2019s prior decision under a different legal standard is not relevant. The motion was denied without prejudice, leaving the opportunity for a renewed motion at a later date.<\/p>\n

Because the plaintiffs did not meet their prima facie burden, the court did not reach the question of whether LEED or other performance-based standards are in fact preempted by EPCA. The motion was denied because the plaintiffs produced a shallow factual record; the court did not explicitly hold that LEED is not preempted by EPCA. Thus, these or other plaintiffs may yet renew a more detailed preemption argument against LEED-based ordinances. Until the merits of this issue are explicitly addressed, states and municipalities that have performance-based systems into their energy efficiency codes and ordinances should remain aware of possible preemption claims against their green building ordinances.<\/p>\n

As of this writing, the preliminary injunction remains in force until the court determines whether the performance-based provisions in Albuquerque\u2019s code are severable from the prescriptive provisions. If they are severable and plaintiffs do not renew their motion for summary judgment, the performance-based provisions in Albuquerque\u2019s code could go into effect.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As part of the Center for Climate Change Law\u2019s efforts to continually improve its model municipal green building ordinance, CCCL has been tracking legal issues relevant to municipal green building ordinances. One major potential impediment to the successful implementation of a green building ordinance is preemption under federal law. While the preemption fears of green […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":330,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[9434,835],"class_list":{"0":"post-254","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"tag-energy-efficiency","8":"tag-state-activity","9":"czr-hentry"},"yoast_head":"\nFederal preemption issues for green building ordinances remain unresolved after recent AHRI ruling - Climate Law Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/12\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Federal preemption issues for green building ordinances remain unresolved after recent AHRI ruling - Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"As part of the Center for Climate Change Law\u2019s efforts to continually improve its model municipal green building ordinance, CCCL has been tracking legal issues relevant to municipal green building ordinances. One major potential impediment to the successful implementation of a green building ordinance is preemption under federal law. While the preemption fears of green […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/12\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-12T16:15:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2013-07-19T17:16:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jason James\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jason James\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/12\\\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/12\\\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jason James\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8f0d9a9c0d7b85121d29f44e3646aaf\"},\"headline\":\"Federal preemption issues for green building ordinances remain unresolved after recent AHRI ruling\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-12T16:15:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-07-19T17:16:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/12\\\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":692,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Energy Efficiency\",\"State Activity\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/12\\\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/12\\\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\\\/\",\"name\":\"Federal preemption issues for green building ordinances remain unresolved after recent AHRI ruling - Climate Law Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-12T16:15:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-07-19T17:16:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/12\\\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/12\\\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2010\\\/10\\\/12\\\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Federal preemption issues for green building ordinances remain unresolved after recent AHRI ruling\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Law Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"width\":2752,\"height\":260,\"caption\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/sabincenter\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e8f0d9a9c0d7b85121d29f44e3646aaf\",\"name\":\"Jason James\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/author\\\/jjames\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Federal preemption issues for green building ordinances remain unresolved after recent AHRI ruling - Climate Law Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/12\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Federal preemption issues for green building ordinances remain unresolved after recent AHRI ruling - Climate Law Blog","og_description":"As part of the Center for Climate Change Law\u2019s efforts to continually improve its model municipal green building ordinance, CCCL has been tracking legal issues relevant to municipal green building ordinances. One major potential impediment to the successful implementation of a green building ordinance is preemption under federal law. While the preemption fears of green […]","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/12\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\/","og_site_name":"Climate Law Blog","article_published_time":"2010-10-12T16:15:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2013-07-19T17:16:04+00:00","author":"Jason James","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@sabincenter","twitter_site":"@sabincenter","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jason James","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/12\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/12\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\/"},"author":{"name":"Jason James","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/e8f0d9a9c0d7b85121d29f44e3646aaf"},"headline":"Federal preemption issues for green building ordinances remain unresolved after recent AHRI ruling","datePublished":"2010-10-12T16:15:53+00:00","dateModified":"2013-07-19T17:16:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/12\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\/"},"wordCount":692,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"keywords":["Energy Efficiency","State Activity"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/12\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/12\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\/","name":"Federal preemption issues for green building ordinances remain unresolved after recent AHRI ruling - Climate Law Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-12T16:15:53+00:00","dateModified":"2013-07-19T17:16:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/12\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/12\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/10\/12\/federal-preemption-issues-for-green-building-ordinances-remain-unresolved-after-recent-ahri-ruling\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Federal preemption issues for green building ordinances remain unresolved after recent AHRI ruling"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","name":"Climate Law Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization","name":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","width":2752,"height":260,"caption":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/sabincenter"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/e8f0d9a9c0d7b85121d29f44e3646aaf","name":"Jason James","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/author\/jjames\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/330"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=254"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}