{"id":1472,"date":"2012-06-14T13:20:55","date_gmt":"2012-06-14T18:20:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?p=1472"},"modified":"2012-06-15T09:55:27","modified_gmt":"2012-06-15T14:55:27","slug":"california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/06\/14\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\/","title":{"rendered":"California Court of Appeal Decision Could Allow for Greater Consideration of Impacts of Climate Change in Environmental Impact Reports"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

By Adam Riedel, CCCL Associate Director and Fellow<\/em><\/p>\n

How and to what extent predicted future, physical impacts from climate change should be considered in environmental impact reports (EIRs) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has never been entirely clear. A recent California Court of Appeal decision invalidated CEQA Guidelines that arguably mandated the consideration of predicted future physical impacts of climate change on a proposed project in EIRs. (Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. City of Los Angeles<\/a> (2011), 134 Cal. Rptr. 3d 194, petition for review denied<\/em>.) However, the same Court of Appeal recently issued a decision that could lead to the greater consideration of the predicted future impacts of climate change in EIRs.<\/p>\n

In Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority<\/a> (Smart Rail), petitioners challenged the use in an EIR of predicted future traffic and air quality conditions as a \u201cbaseline\u201d by which to analyze the predicted impacts of a proposed expansion of light rail transit. Challengers asserted that CEQA Guidelines mandated the use of existing conditions, rather than projected future conditions, as the baseline for this evaluation. In a decision that broke from the approach taken by two other Courts of Appeal, the Second District Court of Appeal held that \u201can agency\u2019s use of a projected future baseline, when supported by substantial evidence, is an appropriate means to analyze the traffic and air quality effects of a long-term infrastructure project.\u201d In reaching this decision, the court focused heavily on the fact that \u201c[p]opulation growth, with its concomitant effects on traffic and air quality, is no hypothetical in Los Angeles County; it is inevitable.\u201d Thus, given that the first segment of the project was not expected to come online until 2015 and the entire project was not expected to be completed until 2030, the court found that the predicted future conditions presented a more accurate baseline by which to judge the impacts of the project than the existing conditions in 2009 when the EIR was prepared.<\/p>\n

Although the holding in Smart Rail<\/em> only applies to traffic and air quality effects, it is not hard to see how the decision may have implications for the consideration of climate change impacts in EIRs. A substantial body of scientific research and sophisticated modeling underlies many predictions regarding the future impacts of climate change. Like the projections of future population growth and its \u201cconcomitant effects\u201d in Smart Rail<\/em>, these climate models and the underlying science could very well serve as the \u201csubstantial evidence\u201d the court seems to require for the use of a baseline of predicted future conditions in an EIR. Furthermore, the court\u2019s focus in its reasoning on ensuring an accurate basis of comparison seems to weigh in favor of considering climate change impacts, especially for projects with long-time horizons such as was the case in Smart Rail<\/em>. In much the same way that the population of LA in 2030 will look very different from the population in 2009, the climate too will look very different making predicted future climatic conditions a more accurate baseline by which to judge environmental impact in many instances.<\/p>\n

As noted above, the Second Court of Appeal decision in Smart Rail deviates from two prior decisions by the Fifth and Sixth District Court of Appeals, respectively. However, if it stands, the decision in Smart Rail<\/em> could pave the way for the greater consideration of the impacts of climate change in EIRs as an aspect of future baseline conditions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Adam Riedel, CCCL Associate Director and Fellow How and to what extent predicted future, physical impacts from climate change should be considered in environmental impact reports (EIRs) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has never been entirely clear. A recent California Court of Appeal decision invalidated CEQA Guidelines that arguably mandated the consideration […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":767,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[5703,5674,5698],"class_list":{"0":"post-1472","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"tag-ceqa","8":"tag-common-law","9":"tag-environmental-impact-statements","10":"czr-hentry"},"yoast_head":"\nCalifornia Court of Appeal Decision Could Allow for Greater Consideration of Impacts of Climate Change in Environmental Impact Reports - Climate Law Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/06\/14\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"California Court of Appeal Decision Could Allow for Greater Consideration of Impacts of Climate Change in Environmental Impact Reports - Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By Adam Riedel, CCCL Associate Director and Fellow How and to what extent predicted future, physical impacts from climate change should be considered in environmental impact reports (EIRs) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has never been entirely clear. A recent California Court of Appeal decision invalidated CEQA Guidelines that arguably mandated the consideration […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/06\/14\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-06-14T18:20:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-06-15T14:55:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Adam Riedel\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Adam Riedel\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/14\\\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/14\\\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Adam Riedel\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5c071a70be999adda1fea0a418369fff\"},\"headline\":\"California Court of Appeal Decision Could Allow for Greater Consideration of Impacts of Climate Change in Environmental Impact Reports\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-06-14T18:20:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-06-15T14:55:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/14\\\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":589,\"commentCount\":2,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"CEQA\",\"Common Law\",\"Environmental Impact Statements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/14\\\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/14\\\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\\\/\",\"name\":\"California Court of Appeal Decision Could Allow for Greater Consideration of Impacts of Climate Change in Environmental Impact Reports - Climate Law Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-06-14T18:20:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-06-15T14:55:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/14\\\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/14\\\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/14\\\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"California Court of Appeal Decision Could Allow for Greater Consideration of Impacts of Climate Change in Environmental Impact Reports\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Law Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"width\":2752,\"height\":260,\"caption\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/sabincenter\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5c071a70be999adda1fea0a418369fff\",\"name\":\"Adam Riedel\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/author\\\/ariede\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"California Court of Appeal Decision Could Allow for Greater Consideration of Impacts of Climate Change in Environmental Impact Reports - Climate Law Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/06\/14\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"California Court of Appeal Decision Could Allow for Greater Consideration of Impacts of Climate Change in Environmental Impact Reports - Climate Law Blog","og_description":"By Adam Riedel, CCCL Associate Director and Fellow How and to what extent predicted future, physical impacts from climate change should be considered in environmental impact reports (EIRs) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has never been entirely clear. A recent California Court of Appeal decision invalidated CEQA Guidelines that arguably mandated the consideration […]","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/06\/14\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\/","og_site_name":"Climate Law Blog","article_published_time":"2012-06-14T18:20:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-06-15T14:55:27+00:00","author":"Adam Riedel","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@sabincenter","twitter_site":"@sabincenter","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Adam Riedel","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/06\/14\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/06\/14\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\/"},"author":{"name":"Adam Riedel","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/5c071a70be999adda1fea0a418369fff"},"headline":"California Court of Appeal Decision Could Allow for Greater Consideration of Impacts of Climate Change in Environmental Impact Reports","datePublished":"2012-06-14T18:20:55+00:00","dateModified":"2012-06-15T14:55:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/06\/14\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\/"},"wordCount":589,"commentCount":2,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"keywords":["CEQA","Common Law","Environmental Impact Statements"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/06\/14\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/06\/14\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\/","name":"California Court of Appeal Decision Could Allow for Greater Consideration of Impacts of Climate Change in Environmental Impact Reports - Climate Law Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-06-14T18:20:55+00:00","dateModified":"2012-06-15T14:55:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/06\/14\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/06\/14\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/06\/14\/california-court-of-appeal-decision-could-allow-for-greater-consideration-of-impacts-of-climate-change-in-environmental-impact-reports\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"California Court of Appeal Decision Could Allow for Greater Consideration of Impacts of Climate Change in Environmental Impact Reports"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","name":"Climate Law Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization","name":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","width":2752,"height":260,"caption":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/sabincenter"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/5c071a70be999adda1fea0a418369fff","name":"Adam Riedel","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/author\/ariede\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/767"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1472"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1472\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}