{"id":1362,"date":"2012-03-19T08:00:54","date_gmt":"2012-03-19T13:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?p=1362"},"modified":"2012-03-19T08:00:54","modified_gmt":"2012-03-19T13:00:54","slug":"ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/03\/19\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\/","title":{"rendered":"GE Wins $170 Million Verdict in One of Several Pending Wind Turbine Patent Litigations with Mitsubishi"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

By Julia Ciardullo
\nFellow<\/p>\n

This is the second in a series of blogs that will discuss some of the most notable recent legal developments in the field of intellectual property law and green technology.\u00a0 In a prior post<\/a>, we discussed the expiration of the USPTO\u2019s Green Technology Pilot Program and the enactment of the America Invents Act.\u00a0 This post will discuss the latest developments in a series of pending patent infringement cases between General Electric Co. (\u201cGE\u201d) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (\u201cMHI\u201d) and its US subsidiaries (collectively, \u201cMitsubishi\u201d) in what has shaped up to be a battle for control of the multi-billion dollar US wind turbine market.<\/p>\n

International Trade Commission Investigation<\/strong><\/p>\n

On February 27, 2008, GE initiated an investigation with the International Trade Commission (\u201cITC\u201d) (Investigation No. 337-TA-641), alleging that Mitsubishi\u2019s variable speed wind turbines infringed three of GE\u2019s patents.\u00a0\u00a0On March 2, 2010, the ITC concluded that Mitsubishi was not in violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act and declined to issue an injunction banning importation of Mitsubishi wind turbines.\u00a0\u00a0GE appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.\u00a0 On February 29, 2012, the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC\u2019s determination that Mitsubishi was not in violation as to one of GE\u2019s patents, but remanded to the ITC for a determination as to whether the second of GE\u2019s patents was valid and infringed by Mitsubishi (the third patent had expired prior to the Federal Circuit\u2019s decision), leaving open the possibility of a victory for GE before the ITC.\u00a0 (Fed. Cir. Case No. 2010-1223). \u00a0The Federal Circuit decision can be found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

District Court Litigations<\/strong><\/p>\n

Other wind turbine patent litigations between GE and MHI remain pending in several district courts around the US.\u00a0 Most notably, on March 8, 2012, a jury in the Northern District of Texas awarded GE $170 million in damages based on alleged infringement by Mitsubishi of a GE patent relating to wind turbine electrical power regulation systems.\u00a0\u00a0(Case No. 3:10-cv-00276, filed February 11, 2010).\u00a0\u00a0The jury verdict can be found here<\/a>.\u00a0 The judge has not yet issued a final order in the case.<\/p>\n

In an earlier case, GE filed suit in the Southern District of Texas alleging infringement by Mitsubishi of several GE patents on variable speed wind turbine control systems.\u00a0\u00a0(Case No. 2:09-cv-00229, filed September 3, 2009).\u00a0\u00a0The case is currently stayed pending final resolution of the ITC action.<\/p>\n

MHI filed its own suit against GE in the Middle District of Florida alleging infringement of MHI\u2019s patent on systems that control the pitch angle of wind turbine blades.\u00a0\u00a0(Case No. 6:10-cv-00812, filed May 20, 2010).\u00a0\u00a0Summary judgment arguments are currently being heard in the case.<\/p>\n

MHI also filed an antitrust lawsuit against GE in the Western District of Arkansas alleging that GE\u2019s variable speed wind turbine patents were fraudulently procured and that GE\u2019s efforts to enforce them against MHI constitute an anticompetitive scheme that has cost MHI billions of dollars.\u00a0\u00a0(Case No. 5:10-cv-05087, filed May 20, 2010).\u00a0\u00a0On August 23, 2010, the court ordered a stay of the case until final resolution of GE\u2019s pending infringement suits, explaining that GE victories in those cases would moot MHI\u2019s antitrust claims.<\/p>\n

A discussion of other major pending litigations concerning solar, biofuels and other green technology patents will be the subject of a future blog post.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Julia Ciardullo Fellow This is the second in a series of blogs that will discuss some of the most notable recent legal developments in the field of intellectual property law and green technology.\u00a0 In a prior post, we discussed the expiration of the USPTO\u2019s Green Technology Pilot Program and the enactment of the America […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":614,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5680,5671,5682],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1362","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-clean-energy","7":"category-international","8":"category-wind-power","9":"czr-hentry"},"yoast_head":"\nGE Wins $170 Million Verdict in One of Several Pending Wind Turbine Patent Litigations with Mitsubishi - Climate Law Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/03\/19\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"GE Wins $170 Million Verdict in One of Several Pending Wind Turbine Patent Litigations with Mitsubishi - Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By Julia Ciardullo Fellow This is the second in a series of blogs that will discuss some of the most notable recent legal developments in the field of intellectual property law and green technology.\u00a0 In a prior post, we discussed the expiration of the USPTO\u2019s Green Technology Pilot Program and the enactment of the America […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/03\/19\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Law Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-03-19T13:00:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Julia Ciardullo\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@sabincenter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Julia Ciardullo\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/03\\\/19\\\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/03\\\/19\\\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Julia Ciardullo\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/93276cf2d815cb846131e5a3295c115e\"},\"headline\":\"GE Wins $170 Million Verdict in One of Several Pending Wind Turbine Patent Litigations with Mitsubishi\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-03-19T13:00:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/03\\\/19\\\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":558,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Clean Energy\",\"International\",\"Wind Power\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/03\\\/19\\\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/03\\\/19\\\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\\\/\",\"name\":\"GE Wins $170 Million Verdict in One of Several Pending Wind Turbine Patent Litigations with Mitsubishi - Climate Law Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-03-19T13:00:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/03\\\/19\\\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/03\\\/19\\\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/2012\\\/03\\\/19\\\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"GE Wins $170 Million Verdict in One of Several Pending Wind Turbine Patent Litigations with Mitsubishi\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Law Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/files\\\/2023\\\/02\\\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png\",\"width\":2752,\"height\":260,\"caption\":\"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/sabincenter\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/93276cf2d815cb846131e5a3295c115e\",\"name\":\"Julia Ciardullo\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\\\/climatechange\\\/author\\\/jciard\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"GE Wins $170 Million Verdict in One of Several Pending Wind Turbine Patent Litigations with Mitsubishi - Climate Law Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/03\/19\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"GE Wins $170 Million Verdict in One of Several Pending Wind Turbine Patent Litigations with Mitsubishi - Climate Law Blog","og_description":"By Julia Ciardullo Fellow This is the second in a series of blogs that will discuss some of the most notable recent legal developments in the field of intellectual property law and green technology.\u00a0 In a prior post, we discussed the expiration of the USPTO\u2019s Green Technology Pilot Program and the enactment of the America […]","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/03\/19\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\/","og_site_name":"Climate Law Blog","article_published_time":"2012-03-19T13:00:54+00:00","author":"Julia Ciardullo","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@sabincenter","twitter_site":"@sabincenter","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Julia Ciardullo","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/03\/19\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/03\/19\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\/"},"author":{"name":"Julia Ciardullo","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/93276cf2d815cb846131e5a3295c115e"},"headline":"GE Wins $170 Million Verdict in One of Several Pending Wind Turbine Patent Litigations with Mitsubishi","datePublished":"2012-03-19T13:00:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/03\/19\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\/"},"wordCount":558,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Clean Energy","International","Wind Power"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/03\/19\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/03\/19\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\/","name":"GE Wins $170 Million Verdict in One of Several Pending Wind Turbine Patent Litigations with Mitsubishi - Climate Law Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-03-19T13:00:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/03\/19\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/03\/19\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2012\/03\/19\/ge-wins-170-million-verdict-in-one-of-several-pending-wind-turbine-patent-litigations-with-mitsubishi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"GE Wins $170 Million Verdict in One of Several Pending Wind Turbine Patent Litigations with Mitsubishi"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","name":"Climate Law Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#organization","name":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/files\/2023\/02\/21-SabinBlog_Banner-1.png","width":2752,"height":260,"caption":"Sabin Center for Climate Change Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/sabincenter"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/#\/schema\/person\/93276cf2d815cb846131e5a3295c115e","name":"Julia Ciardullo","url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/author\/jciard\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/614"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1362"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1362\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}