{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Climate Law Blog","provider_url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange","author_name":"Jason James","author_url":"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/author\/jjames\/","title":"Cap-and-Trade Under the Clean Air Act? Rethinking Section 115 - Climate Law Blog","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aUWgWWbyGs\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/03\/08\/72\/\">Cap-and-Trade Under the Clean Air Act? Rethinking Section 115<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.law.columbia.edu\/climatechange\/2010\/03\/08\/72\/embed\/#?secret=aUWgWWbyGs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Cap-and-Trade Under the Clean Air Act? Rethinking Section 115&#8221; &#8212; Climate Law Blog\" data-secret=\"aUWgWWbyGs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"by Hannah Chang As comprehensive climate legislation stagnates in Congress, the possibility of greenhouse gas (\u201cGHG\u201d) regulation under the Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s (\u201cEPA\u201d) existing Clean Air Act (\u201cthe Act\u201d) authority as the sole federal means of addressing climate change becomes increasingly likely.\u00a0 Whether EPA has existing authority to implement a cap-and-trade program for GHGs, which [&hellip;]"}