<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Climate Law Blog</provider_name><provider_url>https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange</provider_url><author_name>Maria Antonia Tigre</author_name><author_url>https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/author/mariatigre/</author_url><title>On the Duarte Agostinho Decision - Climate Law Blog</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="DM6abBppMP"&gt;&lt;a href="https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/2024/04/16/on-the-duarte-agostinho-decision/"&gt;On the Duarte Agostinho Decision&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/2024/04/16/on-the-duarte-agostinho-decision/embed/#?secret=DM6abBppMP" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;On the Duarte Agostinho Decision&#x201D; &#x2014; Climate Law Blog" data-secret="DM6abBppMP" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/files/2024/04/unnamed-scaled-e1713293869238.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1890</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>1723</thumbnail_height><description>On April 9, 2024, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) issued its first-ever findings concerning climate change. This post, part of a series on the ECtHR decisions, discusses Duarte Agostinho and Others v. 32 Member States. The case was brought by six youth applicants from Portugal, who alleged breaches of Articles 2, 3, 8 [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
