<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Climate Law Blog</provider_name><provider_url>https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange</provider_url><author_name>Andrea Nishi</author_name><author_url>https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/author/anishi1/</author_url><title>Administrative Interpretation of the CLCPA - Climate Law Blog</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="Q0VAbGXrZX"&gt;&lt;a href="https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/2023/03/30/administrative-interpretation-of-the-clcpa/"&gt;Administrative Interpretation of the CLCPA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/2023/03/30/administrative-interpretation-of-the-clcpa/embed/#?secret=Q0VAbGXrZX" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Administrative Interpretation of the CLCPA&#x201D; &#x2014; Climate Law Blog" data-secret="Q0VAbGXrZX" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/files/2023/03/Natural-Gas-Plant.jpeg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1024</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>683</thumbnail_height><description>In January, the first case to enforce the requirements of New York&#x2019;s Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) was filed in the state Supreme Court. Enacted in 2019, the CLCPA sets ambitious greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals for the State of New York, while incorporating principles of environmental justice. Under the CLCPA, state agencies [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
