<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Gender &amp; Sexuality Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog</link>
	<description>A Forum for Debate of Issues in Gender and Sexuality Law at Columbia Law School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:22:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Supports &#8220;No-Condoms-as-Evidence-of–Prostitution&#8221; Bill by sexgenderbody</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/11/20/sexuality-and-gender-law-clinic-supports-no-condoms-as-evidence-of%e2%80%93prostitution-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator>sexgenderbody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/?p=1702#comment-1891</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Supports “No-Condoms-as-Evidence-of–Prostitution” Bill http://ff.im/-bLRIV&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Supports “No-Condoms-as-Evidence-of–Prostitution” Bill <a href="http://ff.im/-bLRIV" rel="nofollow">http://ff.im/-bLRIV</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NY&#8217;s Highest Court Refuses to Invalidate State Policy Recognizing Same-Sex Couples&#8217; Out-of-State Marriages by Dan Moshenberg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/11/19/nys-highest-court-refuses-to-invalidate-state-policy-recognizing-same-sex-couples-out-of-state-marriages/comment-page-1/#comment-1890</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Moshenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/?p=1694#comment-1890</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;NY’s Highest Court Refuses to Invalidate State Policy Recognizing Same-Sex Out-of-State Marriages http://ff.im/-bJZkV&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">NY’s Highest Court Refuses to Invalidate State Policy Recognizing Same-Sex Out-of-State Marriages <a href="http://ff.im/-bJZkV" rel="nofollow">http://ff.im/-bJZkV</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NY&#8217;s Highest Court Refuses to Invalidate State Policy Recognizing Same-Sex Couples&#8217; Out-of-State Marriages by sexgenderbody</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/11/19/nys-highest-court-refuses-to-invalidate-state-policy-recognizing-same-sex-couples-out-of-state-marriages/comment-page-1/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>sexgenderbody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/?p=1694#comment-1889</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;NY’s Highest Court Refuses to Invalidate State Policy Recognizing Same-Sex Couples’ Out-of-State Marriages http://ff.im/-bJZkV&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">NY’s Highest Court Refuses to Invalidate State Policy Recognizing Same-Sex Couples’ Out-of-State Marriages <a href="http://ff.im/-bJZkV" rel="nofollow">http://ff.im/-bJZkV</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Freak-ish Feminism: The “Perilous” Results of the Women’s Liberation Movement by Amelia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/10/30/freak-ish-feminism-the-%e2%80%9cperilous%e2%80%9d-results-of-the-women%e2%80%99s-liberation-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-1865</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/?p=1484#comment-1865</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, thank you ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, thank you <img src='http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Message to Dems Who Voted for Stupak: You Better Cut Funding for Viagra, Prostate Cancer, Male Infertility &amp; Vasectomies As Well by Pregnancy Assistant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/11/12/message-to-dems-who-voted-for-stupak-you-better-cut-funding-for-viagra-prostate-cancer-male-infertility-vasectomies-as-well/comment-page-1/#comment-1857</link>
		<dc:creator>Pregnancy Assistant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/?p=1656#comment-1857</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Gender &amp; Sexuality Law Blog » Blog Archive » Message to Dems Who ... http://bit.ly/4Axq8I&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Gender &amp; Sexuality Law Blog » Blog Archive » Message to Dems Who &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/4Axq8I" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4Axq8I</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Message to Dems Who Voted for Stupak: You Better Cut Funding for Viagra, Prostate Cancer, Male Infertility &amp; Vasectomies As Well by maymaym</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/11/12/message-to-dems-who-voted-for-stupak-you-better-cut-funding-for-viagra-prostate-cancer-male-infertility-vasectomies-as-well/comment-page-1/#comment-1854</link>
		<dc:creator>maymaym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/?p=1656#comment-1854</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Dems Who Voted for Stupak: You Better Cut Funding for Viagra, Prostate Cancer, Male Infertility &amp; Vasectomies, too! http://ff.im/-bosW5 #hcr&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Dems Who Voted for Stupak: You Better Cut Funding for Viagra, Prostate Cancer, Male Infertility &amp; Vasectomies, too! <a href="http://ff.im/-bosW5" rel="nofollow">http://ff.im/-bosW5</a> #hcr</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Message to Dems Who Voted for Stupak: You Better Cut Funding for Viagra, Prostate Cancer, Male Infertility &amp; Vasectomies As Well by sexgenderbody</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/11/12/message-to-dems-who-voted-for-stupak-you-better-cut-funding-for-viagra-prostate-cancer-male-infertility-vasectomies-as-well/comment-page-1/#comment-1852</link>
		<dc:creator>sexgenderbody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/?p=1656#comment-1852</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Dems Who Voted for Stupak: You Better Cut Funding for Viagra, Prostate Cancer, Male Infertility &amp; Vasectomies As Well http://ff.im/-bosW5&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Dems Who Voted for Stupak: You Better Cut Funding for Viagra, Prostate Cancer, Male Infertility &amp; Vasectomies As Well <a href="http://ff.im/-bosW5" rel="nofollow">http://ff.im/-bosW5</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Message to Dems Who Voted for Stupak: You Better Cut Funding for Viagra, Prostate Cancer, Male Infertility &amp; Vasectomies As Well by Curves of Whitehall</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/11/12/message-to-dems-who-voted-for-stupak-you-better-cut-funding-for-viagra-prostate-cancer-male-infertility-vasectomies-as-well/comment-page-1/#comment-1851</link>
		<dc:creator>Curves of Whitehall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/?p=1656#comment-1851</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Gender &amp; Sexuality Law Blog » Blog Archive » Message to Dems Who ... http://bit.ly/3gAk7n&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Gender &amp; Sexuality Law Blog » Blog Archive » Message to Dems Who &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/3gAk7n" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3gAk7n</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Message to Dems Who Voted for Stupak: You Better Cut Funding for Viagra, Prostate Cancer, Male Infertility &amp; Vasectomies As Well by hysperia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/11/12/message-to-dems-who-voted-for-stupak-you-better-cut-funding-for-viagra-prostate-cancer-male-infertility-vasectomies-as-well/comment-page-1/#comment-1850</link>
		<dc:creator>hysperia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/?p=1656#comment-1850</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  I loved Katha&#039;s piece too.  But she really liked the Michelson/Kissling piece and posted it on her Facebook fan page.  I think it rawks too.  This actually IS a matter of politics and if women don&#039;t figure that out soon, women are going to lose, lose and lose again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I loved Katha&#8217;s piece too.  But she really liked the Michelson/Kissling piece and posted it on her Facebook fan page.  I think it rawks too.  This actually IS a matter of politics and if women don&#8217;t figure that out soon, women are going to lose, lose and lose again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Was Going On While Everyone Was Talking About Maine by Ms Sassy Pants</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/11/11/what-was-going-on-while-everyone-was-talking-about-maine/comment-page-1/#comment-1847</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Sassy Pants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/?p=1647#comment-1847</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @transadvocate: What Was Going On While Everyone Was Talking About Maine http://tr.im/EPTi #glbt #transgender #p2 #fem2&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @transadvocate: What Was Going On While Everyone Was Talking About Maine <a href="http://tr.im/EPTi" rel="nofollow">http://tr.im/EPTi</a> #glbt #transgender #p2 #fem2</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
