Nicole Medham is a third year law student at Columbia Law School and has these thoughts about a recent 20/20 episode that caught her attention when the authors of Freakonomics were interviewed about the what and why of various implications of feminism:
Last Friday’s edition of ABC’s 20/20 featured the authors of the bestseller Freakonomics, Steven [...]
Posted in: Gendering the Economy, Marriage, Popular Culture, Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Technology, Sex Work, Women and Poverty | Comments (4)
Both during and after the City Bar Association panel I participated in a few weeks ago on the future of same sex marriage, I’ve gotten some push back for suggesting that we consider and evaluate the merits and risks of various constitutional arguments that have been made in the cases challenging the exclusion of same [...]
Posted in: Discrimination, Marriage, Pregnancy, Queer Theory, Reproductive Rights, Sexual Orientation Discrimination, Uncategorized, Women and Poverty | Comment (1)
On Friday, the Gender and Sexuality Law Program held its inaugural symposium, this year honoring the work of Professor Martha Nussbaum. Nine scholars submitted papers providing insights on Professor Nussbaum’s scholarship, points of departure for her theories, and novel applications of her theories to many different contexts. Dean Schizer introduced Professor Nussbaum before her keynote speech at the end [...]
Posted in: Discrimination, Education, International Law, Law School, Marriage, Race and Racism, Sex Trafficking, Sex Work, Uncategorized, Women and Poverty | Comment (0)
From Columbia Law School Professor Patricia Williams, via The Nation
For some years now, the biotechnology of fertility enhancement has been exalted as God’s gift to the biblically barren. A relentless narrative of entitlement intertwined with prayerfulness has framed infertility as a tragedy, an oppression, an agony, a disease. Some have proclaimed a “right” to [...]
Posted in: Discrimination, Marriage, Race and Racism, Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Technology, Sex Work, Surrogacy, Women and Poverty, Women of Color | Comment (0)
Yesterday, the Gender and Sexuality Law Program kicked off its spring 2009 colloquium with the presentation and discussion of Professor Anna Marie Smith’s paper entitled “Reproductive Technology, Family Law, and the Post-welfare State: The California Same-Sex Parents’ Rights ‘Victories’ of 2005.“ Professor Smith’s article touches on several facets of parental rights and its intersection with [...]
Posted in: Discrimination, Lesbian & Gay Parenting, Marriage, Race and Racism, Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Technology, Women and Poverty | Comment (1)
As politicians and pundits debate the need for and contents of an economic stimulus program early in the Obama Administration, one issue has gained less attention than it should, and the attention it has gotten is – to my mind – largely of the wrong kind. The issue is Gender. How should women’s [...]
Posted in: Discrimination, Women and Poverty | Comments (2)
Nazneen Mehta is a second-year law student at Columbia Law School and is writing a Note on the international market in surrogacy services – particularly between relatively affluent “intended parents” in the US and poor female surrogates in India. Her Note will examine the ways in which this market might better be regulated by [...]
Posted in: International Law, Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Technology, Sex Work, Surrogacy, Women and Poverty, Women of Color | Comments (4)