<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gender &#38; Sexuality Law Blog &#187; Title IX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/category/title-ix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog</link>
	<description>A Forum for Debate of Issues in Gender and Sexuality Law at Columbia Law School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:09:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Should Title IX Apply to the Media?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/03/17/should-title-ix-apply-to-the-media/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/03/17/should-title-ix-apply-to-the-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KATHERINE FRANKE</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/?p=712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Title IX, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimination by recipients of federal funds has had, among other things, a tremendous effect in equalizing the funding and status of women&#8217;s collegiate sports.  The Women&#8217;s NBA would not exist were it not for Title IX creating a pipeline of excellent collegiate female basketball players.  Many people, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://button.topsy.com/widget/retweet-big?url=http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/03/17/should-title-ix-apply-to-the-media/"></script></div><p>Title IX, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimination by recipients of federal funds has had, among other things, a tremendous effect in equalizing the funding and status of women&#8217;s collegiate sports.  The Women&#8217;s NBA would not exist <a rel="attachment wp-att-728" href="http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/files/2009/03/uconn.jpeg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-728" src="http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/files/2009/03/uconn.jpeg" alt="uconn" width="320" height="240" /></a>were it not for Title IX creating a pipeline of excellent collegiate female basketball players.  Many people, myself included, feel that women&#8217;s college basketball is much more fun to watch than men&#8217;s because the women do old fashioned things like pass the ball and play like a team, whereas the men&#8217;s game is all about individual ball hogging, dunking and general show-offery.</p>
<p>So I was more than usually annoyed at the New York Times&#8217; Sports section <a rel="attachment wp-att-738" href="http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/files/2009/03/toliver1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-738" src="http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/files/2009/03/toliver1.jpg" alt="NCAA Vanderbilt Maryland Basketball" width="238" height="363" /></a>yesterday when it ran stories about the NCAA Basketball tournament draw &#8211; printing only the men&#8217;s bracket.  In past years they featured more prominently the men&#8217;s bracket, but covered the women&#8217;s bracket as well.  This year, they didn&#8217;t even bother to print the women&#8217;s draw.  Cost saving?  Probably.  Sexism?  Surely.</p>
<p>But this injury was horribly compounded when Rachel Maddow did the same thing last night with her (annoying, sorry) sidekick Kent Jones.  They finished off the hour with their usual fluffy banter, covering the men&#8217;s <span style="text-decoration: underline">and not the women&#8217;s</span> draw &#8211; each picking their favorites for the men&#8217;s final four.  Rachel Maddow too?  Oy &#8211; what has the world come to?  Should we amend Title IX to cover the media?  Seems we must.</p>
<p>So here it is and you can see it bigger <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/ncw/tournament/bracket">here</a>:</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-715" href="http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/files/2009/03/09womens_bracket.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-715" src="http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/files/2009/03/09womens_bracket.gif" alt="09womens_bracket" /></a></p>
<p>- Katherine Franke</p>
<p><img src="/DOCUME%7E1/KATHER%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-2.jpg" alt="" /></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/03/17/should-title-ix-apply-to-the-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
