1 comment  

Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Files Amicus Briefs in 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Arguing Laws Barring Gay Couples from Marrying and Denying Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages Violate U.S. Constitution’s Due Process Guarantee

Media Contact: Public Affairs, 212-854-2650 or publicaffairs@law.columbia.edu

New York, June 17, 2014—Four states—Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee—violate the U.S. Constitution’s due process guarantee by interfering with individuals’ ability to choose their spouse and by refusing to recognize same-sex couples’ marriages, Columbia Law School’s Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic argues in amicus briefs filed yesterday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

The clinic’s briefs–one for each state–explain that the due process guarantee has long been understood to protect against government interference in fundamental personal decision making, including the choice of one’s spouse. In these states, the marriage laws generally put few limits on that freedom–except for the refusal to allow same-sex couples to marry and to recognize their marriages.

In each of the four cases, gay and lesbian couples had sought to marry or to have their marriages recognized by their home state. They all prevailed in the district courts in their states, and the Sixth Circuit is now scheduled to hear appeals from each state.

Columbia Law School Professor Suzanne B. Goldberg, who directs the Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic and is a leading expert on civil rights and constitutional law, authored the briefs.

“Marriage laws in these states deny a basic right that different-sex couples enjoy: the freedom to choose their own spouse and to have the state recognize that choice no matter where the marriage takes place,” Goldberg said. “Against the backdrop of the U.S. Supreme Court’s strong protection for the freedom to marry, these states’ laws are strikingly unconstitutional.”

Columbia Law School students Julia Maddera ’16 and Hunter Vanaria ’16 assisted with research for the brief.

Oral argument in the cases is scheduled for August 6. Read the KentuckyMichiganOhio, andTennessee briefs.

# # #

Columbia Law School, founded in 1858, stands at the forefront of legal education and of the law in a global society. Columbia Law School combines traditional strengths in corporate law and financial regulation, international and comparative law, property, contracts, constitutional law, and administrative law with pioneering work in intellectual property, digital technology, tax law and policy, national security, human rights, sexuality and gender, and environmental law.

Join us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/columbialaw

One comment

  1. I have recite a few of the articles on your website now, and I in fact similar to your style of blogging. I additional it to my favorites blog situate slant and will be checking back before long. Delight ensure not on my site as satisfactorily and let me know what you think.

Add a comment

Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.



"Homeland" Security Abortion Rights Activism Adoption adultery Advocacy Affordable Care Act Alien Tort Claims Act Amicus Brief Asylum Bankruptcy BDS Bullying Census Politics Children Citizenship Civil Unions Clinic Columbia Law School Compulsory Marriage Condoms Contraception Contraception Mandate Cordoba House Criminal Law Cures for Homosexuality Defense of Marriage Act Disability Rights Discrimination Divorce Domestic Partnership Domestic Violence Domestic Workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Earth Day Economic Justice Education Egypt Elections Employment Discrimination ENDA Estate Planning Events Family Law Fellowships femininity Feminism Free Speech Gender and Technology Gender Identity Discrimination Gendering the Economy Gender Justice GSL Online Haiti Hate Crimes Health Care Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton HIV HIV Discrimination Hobby Lobby Homelessness Homophobia Housing Human Rights Identity Politics Illegitimacy (sic) Immigration Reform In-ing Incest India International Law Intersectional Feminism Islamophobia Israel Jobs Justice Sotomayor King & Spalding Labor Trafficking Land Reform Law School Legal Profession Legal Scholarship Lesbian & Gay Parenting LGBT Parenting Marital Status Discrimination Marriage Marriage Equality Masculinity Medicaid Michelle Obama Migration Military National Security Obama Administration Obama Appointments Obergefell Outing OWS Palestine Parenting Pinkwashing Policing Politics of the Veil Polyamory Popular Culture Pornograpy Pregnancy Presidential Politics Prisons Privacy Products Liability Profanity Prop 8 Prosecutorial Discretion Publications Public Rights/Private Conscience Public Rights/Private Conscience Project Queer Theory Queer vs. Gay Rights Race and Racism Racial Stereotyping Rape Religion Religious Accommodation Religious Exemption Religious Exemptions Religious Freedom Restoration Act Religious Fundamentalism Reproductive Rights Reproductive Technology RFRA Romania Rwanda Sartorial Commentary Schools Sex Discrimination Sex Education Sex Stereotyping Sexting Sex Trafficking Sexual Assault Sexual Duplicity Sexual Harassment Sexual Health Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Sexual Orientation Discrimination Sex Work Silencing of voices SMUG Sodomy Law Reform Solidarity Sports Supreme Court Surrogacy Technology Title IX Trafficking Transgender Uganda Uncategorized Violence Women and Poverty Women of Color Work Zimbabwe

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.