Racial Profiling, Police Misconduct, and Gender

Posted on July 16th, 2012 by Lauren Gutterman

From Julie Goldscheid, Professor of Law, CUNY School of Law and 2011-2012 Center for Gender & Sexuality Law Senior Fellow.

The End Racial Profiling Act (H.R. 3618) and similar state legislation bring needed attention to racial profiling and its attendant harms. Heightened attention to discriminatory law enforcement practices presents an opportunity to consider the range of forms police misconduct may take.

Popular understandings of police misconduct typically involve over-enforcement of laws in ways that impact communities based on race. But police misconduct can involve under-enforcement as well. Domestic and sexual violence cases often are characterized by lax responses and a failure adequately to respond. Since domestic and sexual violence disproportionately affect women, under-enforcement has a disproportionate effect based on gender. Rather than being treated as raising separate issues, these cases should be thought of in tandem, as two ends on a continuum of law enforcement misconduct.

Law enforcement officers historically failed to respond to calls for assistance in cases of domestic violence and sexual assault. No doubt, much progress has been made in law enforcement’s policies and practices. Nevertheless, as recent Department of Justice investigations detail, discriminatory practices continue. Too often, police still fail to take these cases seriously, fail adequately to investigate and respond, and persist in responding to complainants in ways that replicate historic gender-based stereotypes. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights recently found the United States to have violated international human rights obligations through inadequate responses to domestic violence that discriminate based on gender. Under-enforcement of domestic and sexual violence laws often reflect and perpetuate gender discrimination and expose survivors to increased danger.

Advocacy for non-discriminatory and responsive law enforcement practices should address both over- and under-policing. Concerns about over-enforcement should not excuse law enforcement’s failure to respond to domestic or sexual violence calls when survivors and their families seek law enforcement intervention. Cases of over- and under-enforcement may be informed by stereotypes and biases based on both race and gender, as well as immigration status, sexual orientation and gender identity. It may be no coincidence that a number of cases challenging law enforcement’s under-responsiveness to gender violence cases have been brought by women of color. A more robust understanding of police misconduct should challenge all forms of bias and should insist on an appropriate and even-handed law enforcement response.


  1. Racial Profiling, Police Misconduct, and Gender – Blogs @ Columbia … http://t.co/Im9T3v6x #police #misconduct

  2. The police misconduct should have to be punishable. The Law enforcement’s failure to respond to domestic or sexual violence calls on the police that cannot be excuses.

  3. I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your website.
    It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable
    for me to come here and visit more often. Did you
    hire out a designer to create your theme? Excellent

  4. Hi there, yeah this post is truly fastidious and I have learned lot of things from it on the
    topic of blogging. thanks.

    Feel free to visit my web-site garcinia ultra nitro max supplement

  5. Really when someone doesn’t know then its up to other viewers that they will assist, so here
    it occurs.

    Here is my weblog … Best Weight

  6. Wow, superb weblog format! How long have you ever
    been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The entire
    look of your site is great, let alone the content!

    my homepage; crazy tips

  7. I believe everything posted was actually very reasonable.
    However, what about this? what if you wrote a catchier title?
    I ain’t suggesting your information is not good., but suppose you added a headline
    that makes people desire more? I mean Gender & Sexuality Law Blog

  8. Hello, I do think your web site could be having browser compatibility problems.

    When I take a look at your blog in Safari, it looks fine however, if opening in I.E., it’s got some overlapping issues.

    I just wanted to provide you with a quick heads up!
    Besides that, excellent blog!

    Here is my web site; organic garcinia

  9. I have read a few of the articles on your website instantly, and I really like your style of blogging. I supplementary it to my favorites blog locate roll and will be real inspection back presently. Satisfy safety inspection out my situate as thriving and allow me identify what you think.

Add a comment

Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.



"Homeland" Security Abortion Rights Activism Adoption adultery Advocacy Affordable Care Act Alien Tort Claims Act Amicus Brief Asylum Bankruptcy BDS Bullying Census Politics Children Citizenship Civil Unions Clinic Columbia Law School Compulsory Marriage Condoms Contraception Contraception Mandate Cordoba House Criminal Law Cures for Homosexuality Defense of Marriage Act Disability Rights Discrimination Divorce Domestic Partnership Domestic Violence Domestic Workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Earth Day Economic Justice Education Egypt Elections Employment Discrimination ENDA Estate Planning Events Family Law Fellowships femininity Feminism Free Speech Gender and Technology Gender Identity Discrimination Gendering the Economy Gender Justice GSL Online Haiti Hate Crimes Health Care Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton Hiring HIV HIV Discrimination Hobby Lobby Homelessness Homophobia Housing Human Rights Identity Politics Illegitimacy (sic) Immigration Reform In-ing Incest India International Law Intersectional Feminism Islamophobia Israel Jobs Justice Sotomayor King & Spalding Labor Trafficking Land Reform Law School Legal Profession Legal Scholarship Lesbian & Gay Parenting LGBT Parenting Marital Status Discrimination Marriage Marriage Equality Masculinity Medicaid Michelle Obama Migration Military National Security Obama Administration Obama Appointments Obergefell Outing OWS Palestine Parenting Pinkwashing Policing Politics of the Veil Polyamory Popular Culture Pornograpy Pregnancy Presidential Politics Prisons Privacy Products Liability Profanity Prop 8 Prosecutorial Discretion Publications Public Rights/Private Conscience Public Rights/Private Conscience Project Queer Theory Queer vs. Gay Rights Race and Racism Racial Stereotyping Rape Religion Religious Accommodation Religious Exemption Religious Exemptions Religious Freedom Restoration Act Religious Fundamentalism Reproductive Rights Reproductive Technology RFRA Romania Rwanda Sartorial Commentary Schools Sex Discrimination Sex Education Sex Stereotyping Sexting Sex Trafficking Sexual Assault Sexual Duplicity Sexual Harassment Sexual Health Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Sexual Orientation Discrimination Sex Work Silencing of voices SMUG Sodomy Law Reform Solidarity Sports Supreme Court Surrogacy Technology Title IX Trafficking Transgender Uganda Uncategorized Violence Women and Poverty Women of Color Work Zimbabwe

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.