The Army, Navy and Air Force have all created new websites with official information about DADT.  The Navy’s, called ”Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Implementation Information” is here, the Army’s is here, and the Air Force’s is here.

Given that Columbia University has now signed an agreement with the Navy to bring NROTC (Naval Reserve Officers Training Corps) back onto the Columbia campus, the Navy’s DADT page is of particular interest.

The page is basically a shell for general Navy news and information.  Only if you really poke around for a while and click on a video link with “News of the Day” as part of the Navy’s “Informing the Fleet” video news program would you find anything to do with DADT – and the DADT story isn’t the lead story at that (the lead is a story about the Navy’s Green Hornet fighter plane that runs on more efficient fuel that the regular Navy planes).  Then we get news of DADT – and the news is not about how well the Navy is doing in preparing the fleet for repeal of DADT, about training in connection there with, or anything about repeal at all.  Rather the story reports on new rules regulating the investigation and discharge of Naval personnel charged with homosexual conduct, NAVADMIN 137/10.  So the news about DADT easiest to find on the site is about how DADT is still being enforced and homosexual sailors are being actively discharged.  Not so good on the “repeal” issue.

Another news story, buried on the page and even harder to find than the first, reports on the Chief Naval Officer’s testimony to the Congress on repeal of DADT last year.  But there’s nothing new on what the Navy is doing to facilitate repeal.

A search of the page’s Information Index for either “Don’t Ask Don’t Tel” or “Homosexual” turns up nothing else.

As for the Army’s new site, Tony Infanti summarizes a few interesting points from the FAQ section:

1. Unrelated to the repeal of DADT, courts have held that consensual sodomy is punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice only under limited circumstances (described in the FAQs).

2. Soldiers can’t get out of the Army because they object to the repeal of DADT.

3. A soldier can’t refuse to share accommodations with a lesbian, gay, or bisexual soldier.

4. No trans soldiers before or after the repeal of DADT.

5. LGB soldiers get only the same benefits as single soldiers.

I’ll reiterate my earlier dismay at Columbia, and other universities, rush to welcome the military back to a full presence on our campuses on the false notion that DADT has been repealed.


  1. What's New On Army, Navy and Air Force's Official "DADT Repeal" Websites? Not Much. http://wp.me/ploC4-11N

  2. What's New On Army, Navy and Air Force's Official "DADT Repeal" Websites? Not Much. http://wp.me/ploC4-11N

  3. US: What’s New On Army, Navy and Air Force’s Official “DADT Repeal” Websites? Not Much. http://t.co/3W3KyLo

  4. Why they should need to create site about DADT? Hoping for the answer. Thanks!

  5. nothing is new on their site

Add a comment

Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.



"Homeland" Security Abortion Rights Activism Adoption adultery Advocacy Affordable Care Act Alien Tort Claims Act Amicus Brief Asylum Bankruptcy BDS Bullying Census Politics Children Citizenship Civil Unions Clinic Columbia Law School Compulsory Marriage Condoms Contraception Contraception Mandate Cordoba House Criminal Law Cures for Homosexuality Defense of Marriage Act Disability Rights Discrimination Divorce Domestic Partnership Domestic Violence Domestic Workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Earth Day Economic Justice Education Egypt Elections Employment Discrimination ENDA Estate Planning Events Family Law Fellowships femininity Feminism Free Speech Gender and Technology Gender Identity Discrimination Gendering the Economy Gender Justice GSL Online Haiti Hate Crimes Health Care Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton Hiring HIV HIV Discrimination Hobby Lobby Homelessness Homophobia Housing Human Rights Identity Politics Illegitimacy (sic) Immigration Reform In-ing Incest India International Law Intersectional Feminism Islamophobia Israel Jobs Justice Sotomayor King & Spalding Labor Trafficking Land Reform Law School Legal Profession Legal Scholarship Lesbian & Gay Parenting LGBT Parenting Marital Status Discrimination Marriage Marriage Equality Masculinity Medicaid Michelle Obama Migration Military National Security Obama Administration Obama Appointments Obergefell Outing OWS Palestine Parenting Pinkwashing Policing Politics of the Veil Polyamory Popular Culture Pornograpy Pregnancy Presidential Politics Prisons Privacy Products Liability Profanity Prop 8 Prosecutorial Discretion Publications Public Rights/Private Conscience Public Rights/Private Conscience Project Queer Theory Queer vs. Gay Rights Race and Racism Racial Stereotyping Rape Religion Religious Accommodation Religious Exemption Religious Exemptions Religious Freedom Restoration Act Religious Fundamentalism Reproductive Rights Reproductive Technology RFRA Romania Rwanda Sartorial Commentary Schools Sex Discrimination Sex Education Sex Stereotyping Sexting Sex Trafficking Sexual Assault Sexual Duplicity Sexual Harassment Sexual Health Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Sexual Orientation Discrimination Sex Work Silencing of voices SMUG Sodomy Law Reform Solidarity Sports Supreme Court Surrogacy Technology Title IX Trafficking Transgender Uganda Uncategorized Violence Women and Poverty Women of Color Work Zimbabwe

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.