Congressperson Chris Lee’s Resignation – Let’s Pause Before We Heap On


Posted on February 9th, 2011 by Katherine Franke
 7 comments  

Many progressives are enjoying a schadenfreude moment connected with tonite’s resignation of Congressperson Chris Lee (R-N.Y.) who got caught flirting through e-mail with a woman on Craigslist’s “women seeking men” list.  Congressman Lee, who stupidly used his real e-mail address in this venture, mis-represented in his marital status (he said he was divorced but in fact he is married), age (he said he was 39 when in fact he is 46) and profession (he said he was a lobbyist when in fact he is a member of Congress).  He even sent the woman a pretty studly picture of himself.

Lee, a conservative Congressman from Western New York, supported Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, opposed it’s repeal, voted against the expansion of hate crimes law to include sexual orientation-based bias crimes, is anti-abortion, opposed the Obama Administration’s efforts at health care reform etc, etc, etc.

He ran for office urging change and the restoration of family values, and that he wanted to serve in Congress because of his son and “to give our children a secure future”:

If you can see this, then you might need a Flash Player upgrade or you need to install Flash Player if it's missing. Get Flash Player from Adobe.

Ok, so don’t let the screen door hit you on the way out.   Sure, for those of us who care about equality, economic justice, basic fairness, and most importantly, decry duplicitousness, it’s great to get this fella out of Congress.  You kind of wonder what other shoes are about to fall given how quickly he resigned from Congress after news of the Craigslist “thing.”

But, and this is a big butt, do we – and by we I mean people who otherwise think critically about sex and sexuality – really want to indict a guy who was just being playful about sex online?  Sure the guy should get a huge amount of grief for being all high and mighty in his public life, and violating those very values in his private life (remember Mr. Spitzer?).  But all he did was flirt in e-mail with someone not his wife.  Do we want to be part of the chorus heaping shame on him for his cyber-randiness?  Again, the duplicity is worthy of criticism, but being playful on sexual chatrooms in and of itself ought not to trigger ritual political seppuku – particularly with something – let’s be honest – this was pretty tame.

7 comments

  1. True — but was Lee pressured to resign by people who “think critically about sex and sexuality” or by the purity police within his own party who have defined morality almost entirely in terms of private sexual conduct? They are the ones who triggered the political seppuku, I think.

  2. playful?! flirting?! On Craig’s list?! how Victorian! this was not a casual encounter at a political fundraiser….the guy was trying to get laid. and he was a righteous moralizing creep, which meets the ‘name and shame’ test. But don’t mistake me for an uptight sex al or anything, just trying to keep them somewhat honest, make them vote right.

  3. the brilliant typist means ‘uptight sex gal’

  4. Haha! The commercial has the words and voice over, ” A New Direction”… as in the show Glee, where the club name is New Directions… as in a phrase that in this case cracks me up: A Nude Erection / a New Direction. LOL! Too funny! He was hoping to show his new direction to a chick from CL. Haha!

  5. New Gender & Sexuality Law Blog Post: Congressperson Chris Lee's Resignation – Let's Pause Before We Heap On http://wp.me/ploC4-T8

  6. I simply had to say thanks again. I’m not certain what I could possibly have worked on without the type of strategies revealed by you over such a problem. It seemed to be an absolute intimidating concern in my opinion, but taking a look at your specialised approach you processed that made me to jump with joy. Now i’m grateful for the information and even trust you know what a powerful job you are undertaking instructing the others all through your web blog. I am sure you’ve never got to know any of us.

  7. Hello.This article was extremely interesting, particularly since I was looking for thoughts on this matter last Wednesday.

Add a comment


Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.

FEATURED POSTS

CATEGORY CLOUD

"Homeland" Security Abortion Rights Activism Adoption adultery Advocacy Affordable Care Act Alien Tort Claims Act Amicus Brief Asylum Bankruptcy BDS Bullying Census Politics Children Citizenship Civil Unions Clinic Columbia Law School Compulsory Marriage Condoms Contraception Contraception Mandate Cordoba House Criminal Law Cures for Homosexuality Defense of Marriage Act Disability Rights Discrimination Divorce Domestic Partnership Domestic Violence Domestic Workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Earth Day Economic Justice Education Egypt Elections Employment Discrimination ENDA Estate Planning Events Family Law Fellowships femininity Feminism Free Speech Gender and Technology Gender Identity Discrimination Gendering the Economy Gender Justice GSL Online Haiti Hate Crimes Health Care Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton HIV HIV Discrimination Hobby Lobby Homelessness Homophobia Housing Human Rights Identity Politics Illegitimacy (sic) Immigration Reform In-ing Incest India International Law Intersectional Feminism Islamophobia Israel Jobs Justice Sotomayor King & Spalding Labor Trafficking Land Reform Law School Legal Profession Legal Scholarship Lesbian & Gay Parenting LGBT Parenting Marital Status Discrimination Marriage Marriage Equality Masculinity Medicaid Michelle Obama Migration Military National Security Obama Administration Obama Appointments Obergefell Outing OWS Palestine Parenting Pinkwashing Policing Politics of the Veil Polyamory Popular Culture Pornograpy Pregnancy Presidential Politics Prisons Privacy Products Liability Profanity Prop 8 Prosecutorial Discretion Publications Public Rights/Private Conscience Public Rights/Private Conscience Project Queer Theory Queer vs. Gay Rights Race and Racism Racial Stereotyping Rape Religion Religious Accommodation Religious Exemption Religious Exemptions Religious Freedom Restoration Act Religious Fundamentalism Reproductive Rights Reproductive Technology RFRA Romania Rwanda Sartorial Commentary Schools Sex Discrimination Sex Education Sex Stereotyping Sexting Sex Trafficking Sexual Assault Sexual Duplicity Sexual Harassment Sexual Health Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Sexual Orientation Discrimination Sex Work Silencing of voices SMUG Sodomy Law Reform Solidarity Sports Supreme Court Surrogacy Technology Title IX Trafficking Transgender Uganda Uncategorized Violence Women and Poverty Women of Color Work Zimbabwe

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.