The Law of Pleasure for HIV Positive People


Posted on December 8th, 2010 by Katherine Franke
 3 comments  

Yesterday, an HIV positive Australian man won a discrimination suit against a medical clinic that refused to treat him for erectile dysfunction on account of his HIV status.  The man, whose name is being withheld, paid the clinic $1995 for treatment, but soon after his treatment began the medical staff determined that he was no longer eligible for treatment because he posed a risk to public health.  The company’s chief executive said the general consensus with the other doctors was not to prescribe injectables for men who were HIV-positive.  The Australian Equal Opportunity Division of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal found that with the use of condoms, HIV positive men pose no risk to public health.  DUH!

The Tribunal ordered that the patient be refunded the full amount he had paid them for the treatment, and awarded them to pay him $30,000 as compensation for the discrimination.  The defendant will appeal the ruling, according to the company’s CEO.  Read the story from the Australian press here.

I started doing HIV discrimination cases in the early 1980s – and many of them were based in the same kind of HIV-based stigma cloaked in bad public health justification.  It’s outrageous to see the same thing continues today.  Back then, it was hard to convince a judge to second guess the scientific opinion of a doctor.  Thankfully, this is less the case today.  Not always the case, but the medical profession is now far less professionally insulated from accountability to disability discrimination laws, and stigma and ignorance get called out for what they are with much greater frequency.

3 comments

  1. New Blog Post: The Law of Pleasure for HIV Positive People http://wp.me/ploC4-Oa

  2. RT @GenderSexLaw: New Blog Post: The Law of Pleasure for HIV Positive People http://wp.me/ploC4-Oa

  3. Even existing subscribers can benefit from the delivers in accordance with their subscription plans.
    They are one of the few hosting sites that say they have gone green and they
    try to provide really good hosting prices and their support
    is great. A website can only be viewable online if it is being hosted to
    a server that connects to the Internet 24 hours a day, 7 times
    a week. The tweet to inform customers of the technical issues could be easily
    and quickly sent from ‘Twitterberry’ – Blackberry Twitter application.
    Sharing web host not-only means that the space will be distributed
    on the server but they can even use their own web
    address, which may not be available during shared services.
    Unmanaged hosting, on the other hand, can increase the workload of the company if they are unaware
    how to run the hosting system. Your domain name server
    will then be pointing at your Hostgator account which will allow you to add domain to Hostgator account.
    The untapped vast potential of skilled IT technicians
    and healthy competition has paved the way to competent shared hosting services.
    There is no extra amount will be charged for this offer.
    When you have customized your MLM blog and enhanced its functionality, you can begin posting articles.

    my webpage Hostgator Voucher

Add a comment


Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.

FEATURED POSTS

CATEGORY CLOUD

"Homeland" Security Abortion Rights Adoption adultery Affordable Care Act Alien Tort Claims Act Amicus Brief Asylum Bankruptcy BDS Bullying Census Politics Children Citizenship Civil Unions Columbia Law School Compulsory Marriage Condoms Contraception Contraception Mandate Cordoba House Criminal Law Cures for Homosexuality Defense of Marriage Act Disability Rights Discrimination Divorce Domestic Partnership Domestic Violence Domestic Workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Economic Justice Education Egypt Elections Employment Discrimination ENDA Estate Planning Events Family Law Fellowships femininity Free Speech Gender and Technology Gender Identity Discrimination Gendering the Economy GSL Online Haiti Hate Crimes Health Care Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton HIV HIV Discrimination Hobby Lobby Homelessness Homophobia Housing Human Rights Identity Politics Illegitimacy (sic) Immigration Reform In-ing Incest India International Law Islamophobia Israel Justice Sotomayor King & Spalding Labor Trafficking Land Reform Law School Legal Profession Legal Scholarship Lesbian & Gay Parenting LGBT Parenting Marital Status Discrimination Marriage Masculinity Medicaid Michelle Obama Migration Military National Security Obama Administration Obama Appointments Outing OWS Palestine Parenting Pinkwashing Policing Politics of the Veil Polyamory Popular Culture Pornograpy Pregnancy Presidential Politics Prisons Privacy Products Liability Profanity Prop 8 Prosecutorial Discretion Publications Public Rights/Private Conscience Queer Theory Queer vs. Gay Rights Race and Racism Racial Stereotyping Rape Religion Religious Accommodation Religious Exemption Religious Freedom Restoration Act Religious Fundamentalism Reproductive Rights Reproductive Technology RFRA Romania Rwanda Sartorial Commentary Schools Sex Discrimination Sex Education Sex Stereotyping Sexting Sex Trafficking Sexual Assault Sexual Duplicity Sexual Harassment Sexual Health Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Sexual Orientation Discrimination Sex Work SMUG Sodomy Law Reform Sports Supreme Court Surrogacy Technology Title IX Trafficking Transgender Uganda Uncategorized Violence Women and Poverty Women of Color Zimbabwe

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.