1 comment  

Less than 24 hours after district court judge Virginia Phillips denied the Obama Administration’s motion to stay the implementation of her order to suspend the ban on out lesbians and gays serving in the military, a three judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals granted the stay “temporarily in order to provide this court with an opportunity to consider fully the issues presented.”

Oy.  The administration made no new arguments to the 9th Circuit than those it made to the lower court at trial or in their motion to stay the district court’s order.  At trial, in the motion for the stay to the district court, and in their appeal to the 9th Circuit the government has made sweeping yet empty claims that immediate suspension of DADT will have enormous consequences for our troops, yet when pressed they can’t point to one specific consequence.  What they’re asking for, and what they got today, is time.  Time to let the internal Pentagon review to work itself out.

But it’s not like they haven’t had time, and it’s not clear what they’d do with the time they have.  As Aaron Belkin, director of the Palm Center at the University of California Santa Barbara, said about the government’s arguments:  “The whole point of the ongoing Pentagon study is how to repeal ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’- as if we don’t know how to do it.  But look what happened last week?  The military suspended it last week with no training and guess what? Nothing happened.  You don’t need to teach the troops how to interact with gays anymore than you need to train them how to deal with Jews.  People know how to behave with one another.”

It’s hard not to hear an echo of the arguments made in some of the same-sex marriage challenges: “Courts shouldn’t order that the institution open itself up to same-sex couples, let this issue work its way through the legislative process.  We should give this sort of radical reform time.”  But same-sex couples have been marrying in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, California and other places and marriage seems to be holding up pretty darn well.

The Courts seem to be held hostage by a kind of  “Chicken Little” thinking in these cases.  But guess what: the world as we know it hasn’t come to an end when a few homosexuals show up – particularly the kind of homosexuals who want to get married or serve in the military.

One comment

  1. Ninth Circuit Signs Up For "Chicken Little" Approach To Gay Rights and Stays Order Suspending Don't Ask Don't Tell http://wp.me/ploC4-JM

Add a comment


Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.

FEATURED POSTS

CATEGORY CLOUD

"Homeland" Security Abortion Rights Activism Adoption adultery Advocacy Affordable Care Act Alien Tort Claims Act Amicus Brief Asylum Bankruptcy BDS Bullying Census Politics Children Citizenship Civil Unions Clinic Columbia Law School Compulsory Marriage Condoms Contraception Contraception Mandate Cordoba House Criminal Law Cures for Homosexuality Defense of Marriage Act Disability Rights Discrimination Divorce Domestic Partnership Domestic Violence Domestic Workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Earth Day Economic Justice Education Egypt Elections Employment Discrimination ENDA Estate Planning Events Family Law Fellowships femininity Feminism Free Speech Gender and Technology Gender Identity Discrimination Gendering the Economy Gender Justice GSL Online Haiti Hate Crimes Health Care Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton HIV HIV Discrimination Hobby Lobby Homelessness Homophobia Housing Human Rights Identity Politics Illegitimacy (sic) Immigration Reform In-ing Incest India International Law Intersectional Feminism Islamophobia Israel Jobs Justice Sotomayor King & Spalding Labor Trafficking Land Reform Law School Legal Profession Legal Scholarship Lesbian & Gay Parenting LGBT Parenting Marital Status Discrimination Marriage Marriage Equality Masculinity Medicaid Michelle Obama Migration Military National Security Obama Administration Obama Appointments Obergefell Outing OWS Palestine Parenting Pinkwashing Policing Politics of the Veil Polyamory Popular Culture Pornograpy Pregnancy Presidential Politics Prisons Privacy Products Liability Profanity Prop 8 Prosecutorial Discretion Publications Public Rights/Private Conscience Public Rights/Private Conscience Project Queer Theory Queer vs. Gay Rights Race and Racism Racial Stereotyping Rape Religion Religious Accommodation Religious Exemption Religious Exemptions Religious Freedom Restoration Act Religious Fundamentalism Reproductive Rights Reproductive Technology RFRA Romania Rwanda Sartorial Commentary Schools Sex Discrimination Sex Education Sex Stereotyping Sexting Sex Trafficking Sexual Assault Sexual Duplicity Sexual Harassment Sexual Health Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Sexual Orientation Discrimination Sex Work Silencing of voices SMUG Sodomy Law Reform Solidarity Sports Supreme Court Surrogacy Technology Title IX Trafficking Transgender Uganda Uncategorized Violence Women and Poverty Women of Color Work Zimbabwe

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.