Gay Adoptions: The New Reality TV?

Posted on June 15th, 2010 by Katherine Franke

Surrogate Kristen Booth Glen

Might Kristen Booth Glen become the next Judge Judy?  Last week she approved a petition from CNN to video and then broadcast the adoption proceedings of a 5-month-old boy named Nicholas by “Tony,” the partner of “Gary,” who conceived the child with a surrogate.  Judiciary Law §218 bars cameras in the courtroom without a judge’s consent, and Domestic Relations Law §114 generally seals adoption records, so the network had to seek Surrogate Glen’s permission to tape and broadcast the adoption.   CNN plans to include the adoption proceedings in a show titled: “In America: Gary and Tony Have a Baby” to be shown at 8 p.m. on June 24th as part of Gay Pride Month.

Our own Suzanne Goldberg was appointed by Glen to serve as the child’s guardian ad litem to undertake an inquiry as to whether the recording and subsequent broadcast of the adoption would be inimical to the best interests of Nicholas.  Here is her report.  And here is Glen’s opinion permitting the taping.  In her opinion she highlights Goldberg’s report as follows:

Citing impressive authority, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Psychiatric Association, she found that “children raised by lesbian and gay parents develop on a par with the children of heterosexual parents along emotional and psychological measures” (see Am Acad Of Pediatrics, Co-Parent or Second-Parent Adoption by Same-Sex Parents, 109 Pediatrics 339 [2002]; American Psychiatric Association, Position Statement 200214 on Adoption and Co-Parenting of Children by Same-Sex Couples [2002]).

Second, she reviewed what she described as an “exponential growth” in media coverage of same-sex couples and their children both in print (as in, inter alia, the New York Times, Boston Herald, USA Today, St. Louis Post Dispatch and Newsday) and on national network television.  After “an extensive review” she found no evidence of any harm’s occurring to the children whose images and identities were included in those and other kinds of media coverage.

Third, Professor Goldberg found that

“media coverage of children with gay parents has important benefits of facilitating acceptance and diminishing prejudice toward gay parents and their children that are in Nicholas’s best interest.”  Reviewing the literature, she quotes scholars as having found that “Broadcast news can [] facilitate acceptance of adoption by reflecting postmodern shifts in thinking about family forms and processes. Such shifts involve recognizing diverse family structures, flexible processes, and alternative conceptions of kinship . . .By covering the procedures of adoption and making recommendations, broadcast news can play a role in the promotion of nongenetic kinship forms” (Susan L. Kline, Amanda I. Karel, Karishma Chatterjee, Covering Adoption: General Depictions in Broadcast News, 55 Family Relations 487, 488 [2006]).

Finally, after interviewing both Gary and Anthony, and placing the instant application in the context of her extensive literature search and her own expert knowledge, she noted that broadcast of the adoption proceeding “will not cause undue exposure of the facts that Nicholas is adopted and has gay parents.”  She wrote

“Anyone who interacts with Nicholas and his parents will know that Nicholas has gay fathers and that he has been adopted by at least one of them because his parents could not both have participated genetically in his conception. These facts about Nicholas’s family, which will be legally secured during the adoption proceeding, cannot be altered by CNN filming Nicholas’s adoption or circulating that film thereafter. Therefore, there is no cause for concern that Nicholas’s privacy rights could be violated by CNN’s filming of the adoption proceeding.”

Professor Goldberg concluded that “CNN’s filming of Nicholas’s second-parent adoption and subsequent circulation of that film footage cannot reasonably be anticipated to cause Nicholas harm” and, importantly, “will serve this child’s best interest.”  Accordingly, this court concludes that granting the application would not “cause harm to any participant in the case”  (Jud L § 218 [3][c][ii]).

Watch the trailer here:


  1. Gay Adoptions: The New Reality TV?

  2. Gay Adoptions: The New Reality TV?

  3. Gay Adoptions: The New Reality TV?

  4. I found your weblog site on google and test just a few of your early posts. Proceed to keep up the superb operate. I just further up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. In search of ahead to reading more from you afterward!…

  5. Normally I do not learn article on blogs, however I would like to say that this write-up very forced me to check out and do it! Your writing taste has been surprised me. Thanks, very nice post.

  6. My brother recommended I might like this blog. He was entirely right. This submit truly made my day. You can not believe simply how so much time I had spent for this info! Thank you!

  7. Attractive section of content. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to assert that I get in fact enjoyed account your blog posts. Anyway I’ll be subscribing for your augment and even I achievement you get admission to consistently fast.

  8. It is perfect time to make a few plans for the long run and it is time to be happy. I have learn this post and if I could I want to suggest you few fascinating issues or advice. Maybe you can write next articles referring to this article. I want to learn even more things about it!

  9. Incredible points. Solid arguments. Keep up the amazing work.

Add a comment

Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.



"Homeland" Security Abortion Rights Activism Adoption adultery Advocacy Affordable Care Act Alien Tort Claims Act Amicus Brief Asylum Bankruptcy BDS Bullying Census Politics Children Citizenship Civil Unions Clinic Columbia Law School Compulsory Marriage Condoms Contraception Contraception Mandate Cordoba House Criminal Law Cures for Homosexuality Defense of Marriage Act Disability Rights Discrimination Divorce Domestic Partnership Domestic Violence Domestic Workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Earth Day Economic Justice Education Egypt Elections Employment Discrimination ENDA Estate Planning Events Family Law Fellowships femininity Feminism Free Speech Gender and Technology Gender Identity Discrimination Gendering the Economy Gender Justice GSL Online Haiti Hate Crimes Health Care Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton Hiring HIV HIV Discrimination Hobby Lobby Homelessness Homophobia Housing Human Rights Identity Politics Illegitimacy (sic) Immigration Reform In-ing Incest India International Law Intersectional Feminism Islamophobia Israel Jobs Justice Sotomayor King & Spalding Labor Trafficking Land Reform Law School Legal Profession Legal Scholarship Lesbian & Gay Parenting LGBT Parenting Marital Status Discrimination Marriage Marriage Equality Masculinity Medicaid Michelle Obama Migration Military National Security Obama Administration Obama Appointments Obergefell Outing OWS Palestine Parenting Pinkwashing Policing Politics of the Veil Polyamory Popular Culture Pornograpy Pregnancy Presidential Politics Prisons Privacy Products Liability Profanity Prop 8 Prosecutorial Discretion Publications Public Rights/Private Conscience Public Rights/Private Conscience Project Queer Theory Queer vs. Gay Rights Race and Racism Racial Stereotyping Rape Religion Religious Accommodation Religious Exemption Religious Exemptions Religious Freedom Restoration Act Religious Fundamentalism Reproductive Rights Reproductive Technology RFRA Romania Rwanda Sartorial Commentary Schools Sex Discrimination Sex Education Sex Stereotyping Sexting Sex Trafficking Sexual Assault Sexual Duplicity Sexual Harassment Sexual Health Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Sexual Orientation Discrimination Sex Work Silencing of voices SMUG Sodomy Law Reform Solidarity Sports Supreme Court Surrogacy Technology Title IX Trafficking Transgender Uganda Uncategorized Violence Women and Poverty Women of Color Work Zimbabwe

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.