The Battle for Gay Marriage — in the Classroom

Posted on May 26th, 2010 by Katherine Franke

Many people regard marriage rights for same-sex couples as the civil rights issue of this generation. Indeed, you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone who doesn’t have strong feelings one way or the other on this issue: Should courts recognize the marriage rights of lesbian and gay couples as a matter of dignity and equality, or should we respect opposition to same-sex matrimony based in religion and traditional morality?

This issue has taken a new turn in recent weeks as Seton Hall University political science professor King Mott was notified that the class he was planning to teach in the fall, titled “Gay Marriage,” might be canceled by the university’s governing board when it meets on June 4. Newark Archbishop John J. Myers said the course conflicts with the teachings of the Catholic Church (Seton Hall is a Catholic university). “This proposed course seeks to promote as legitimate a train of thought that is contrary to what the Church teaches,” Archbishop Myers said in a statement. “As a result, the course is not in synch with Catholic teaching.”

We have taken a special interest in professor Mott’s class because we too are scheduled to teach a new class titled “Gay Marriage” this fall at Columbia University, through the Institute for Research on Women and Gender. The flier we put together to advertise the class poses two views of the marriage issue: One image captures gay rights demonstrators protesting laws that preclude them from marrying, while the other image, from the group Dyke Action Machine, asks: “Why Be Boring for a Blender? You Might as Well Be Straight.”

Unlike professor Mott, we have little worry that officials from our university will step in and cancel our class for ideological or moral reasons. But that doesn’t mean that we are immune from ideological criticism of the material we will cover in our course. Oddly enough, that criticism may come from the LGBT community itself.

The Catholic Church has an official line on same-sex marriage — totally against it — and by and large the official gay community has one too — totally for it. But there are more than a few people within the lesbian and gay community who have questioned the wisdom of the political and legal strategies pursued by the leading gay rights organizations to make marriage the most important issue of the day. Why would a movement founded by sex radicals, transvestites and lesbian-feminists set their sights on assimilation to and inclusion in such an outmoded, sexist and heterosexist institution? (This is where the blender critique comes in.) The respectability that marriage would confer on same-sex couples is exactly what they don’t want. Not surprisingly, the movement’s lawyers who have elevated same-sex marriage to issue No. 1 have not taken kindly to this criticism.

This kind of intra-community debate is not new. Recall that when the NAACP and other civil rights organizations made racial integration their top priority in the 1950s, some parts of the black community objected. The dissenters felt that it was more important to push for greater resources for the black community than to fight for black children to win the right to sit next to white children in school. That was a difficult and principled disagreement between factions within a community, and we’re having a similar one now in the gay community about marriage.

It’s the richness of this debate that renders it such a likely and important subject of academic study, not the fact that the professors teaching the course have a particular political agenda they want to advance with their students. Marriage has a rich and complex history in the United States, one that is tied up in evolving notions of equality, liberty, dignity and citizenship, as well as family, respectability, love and what it means to be an adult. What’s more, almost all recent welfare reform initiatives have included funding for programs that would encourage poor people to marry and teach them how to stay married. Underlying these initiatives isn’t romance and warm and fuzzy feelings about the family, but the state’s interest in privatizing the costs of paying for poor children.

Treating gay marriage as a “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” issue both fails to grasp the complexity of this particular political issue and deprives students of the opportunity to think critically about how the world is changing and why it should. In the end, some or many Seton Hall students might come to agree with official church doctrine on marriage for same-sex couples, but doing so as a matter of orthodoxy rather than critical reflection defies the whole idea of what it means to receive a higher education.

This post, written by Professors Katherine Franke (Law) and Katherine Biers (English/Comp Lit) is cross-posted from 


  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by SacramentoGayMen, Adam Howard. Adam Howard said: The Battle for Gay Marriage — in the Classroom […]

  2. The Battle for Gay Marriage — in the Classroom

  3. The Battle for Gay Marriage — in the Classroom

  4. The Battle for Gay Marriage — in the Classroom

  5. Gender & Sexuality Law Blog » Blog Archive » The Battle for Gay …: Many people regard marriage rights for same-s…

  6. The Battle for Gay Marriage — in the Classroom // I devour every word written by Franke, on this blog in particular.

  7. Now that’s interesting. You know – Recently, the debate over gay and lesbian marriages has grown into a nationwide controversy, reverberating in the halls of Congress, at the White House, in dozens of state legislatures and courtrooms, and in the rhetoric of election campaigns at both the national and state levels. Politicians don’t want to miss the opportunity to encash this ‘win vote bank opportunity’. As the debate rages on, the American religious community remains deeply divided over the issue, and over the morality of homosexuality generally

  8. Amazing post, has to be a regular guest from now on!

  9. I think other website owners should take this website as an example , very clean and great user genial style and design .

  10. Blogs ou should be reading…

  11. I am truly pleased to read this web site posts which consists of plenty of valuable information, thanks for providing such data.

  12. Bonjour, Voici un très bon site web simple d’utilisation pour les annonces sur le web. Passer les petites annonces gratuites sur le site est 100% gratuit. Les Petites Annonces sont en ligne immédiatement et les annonces sont triées par catégories ou par ville.

  13. Thanks for your concepts. One thing really noticed is the fact that banks as well as financial institutions know the dimensions and spending routines of consumers and as well understand that a lot of people max outside their own credit cards around the breaks. They correctly take advantage of this real fact and commence flooding your inbox and also snail-mail box by using hundreds of Zero APR credit cards offers shortly after the holiday season comes to an end. Knowing that should you be like 98% of American open public, you’ll leap at the possible opportunity to consolidate card debt and shift balances to 0 APR credit cards.BMW X6 review

  14. I simply wanted to write a simple word in order to express gratitude to you for some of the fabulous tips you are placing on this site. My incredibly long internet search has at the end been recognized with awesome information to write about with my friends and family. I would state that that many of us visitors actually are definitely blessed to be in a magnificent community with very many lovely professionals with good concepts. I feel really blessed to have seen your webpages and look forward to tons of more pleasurable minutes reading here. Thank you again for a lot of things.

  15. I’d should talk to you here. Which is not some thing I do! I quite like reading a post which will make people believe. Also, many thanks permitting me to comment!

  16. I just couldn’t depart your site prior to suggesting that I extremely enjoyed the standard information an individual provide for your visitors? Is gonna be back frequently in order to inspect new posts

  17. you’re in reality a good webmaster. The site loading pace is amazing. It seems that you’re doing any unique trick. Also, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve performed a excellent activity in this subject!

  18. Logan February 9, 2014 at 9:25 pm

  19. That’s a great read through. I’m keen on your blog.
    Many thanks for sharing.

    my web-site jailbreak 4.2.1 iphone 3g (

  20. That was a powerful article. Everyone loves this site.
    Thank you for blogging.

    My web blog :: las vegas web designer (

  21. I really couldn

Add a comment

Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.



"Homeland" Security Abortion Rights Activism Adoption adultery Advocacy Affordable Care Act Alien Tort Claims Act Amicus Brief Asylum Bankruptcy BDS Bullying Census Politics Children Citizenship Civil Unions Clinic Columbia Law School Compulsory Marriage Condoms Contraception Contraception Mandate Cordoba House Criminal Law Cures for Homosexuality Defense of Marriage Act Disability Rights Discrimination Divorce Domestic Partnership Domestic Violence Domestic Workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Earth Day Economic Justice Education Egypt Elections Employment Discrimination ENDA Estate Planning Events Family Law Fellowships femininity Feminism Free Speech Gender and Technology Gender Identity Discrimination Gendering the Economy Gender Justice GSL Online Haiti Hate Crimes Health Care Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton Hiring HIV HIV Discrimination Hobby Lobby Homelessness Homophobia Housing Human Rights Identity Politics Illegitimacy (sic) Immigration Reform In-ing Incest India International Law Intersectional Feminism Islamophobia Israel Jobs Justice Sotomayor King & Spalding Labor Trafficking Land Reform Law School Legal Profession Legal Scholarship Lesbian & Gay Parenting LGBT Parenting Marital Status Discrimination Marriage Marriage Equality Masculinity Medicaid Michelle Obama Migration Military National Security Obama Administration Obama Appointments Obergefell Outing OWS Palestine Parenting Pinkwashing Policing Politics of the Veil Polyamory Popular Culture Pornograpy Pregnancy Presidential Politics Prisons Privacy Products Liability Profanity Prop 8 Prosecutorial Discretion Publications Public Rights/Private Conscience Public Rights/Private Conscience Project Queer Theory Queer vs. Gay Rights Race and Racism Racial Stereotyping Rape Religion Religious Accommodation Religious Exemption Religious Exemptions Religious Freedom Restoration Act Religious Fundamentalism Reproductive Rights Reproductive Technology RFRA Romania Rwanda Sartorial Commentary Schools Sex Discrimination Sex Education Sex Stereotyping Sexting Sex Trafficking Sexual Assault Sexual Duplicity Sexual Harassment Sexual Health Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Sexual Orientation Discrimination Sex Work Silencing of voices SMUG Sodomy Law Reform Solidarity Sports Supreme Court Surrogacy Technology Title IX Trafficking Transgender Uganda Uncategorized Violence Women and Poverty Women of Color Work Zimbabwe

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.