Another Step Backwards For Women’s Rights in Italy


Posted on November 5th, 2009 by Katherine Franke

PalumboLetizia Palumbo is a visiting scholar at Columbia Law School, and a Ph.D. Candidate at the University of Palermo, Department of Politics, Law and Society.  This fall at Columbia she is researching the limits of current feminist interpretations of sex-trafficking developed around the “victim” versus “agency” dichotomy.  These are her thoughts about two recent cases of sexual violence in Italy:

Last October 17th in Italy, the Court of Appeals of Rome issued a sentence declaring that the rape of a sex worker is less punishable than the rape of a woman that does not choose to be a prostitute. The day after, October 18th, the Juvenile Court of Rome decided to suspend the trial of eight Italian boys who raped a young girl of 14. These two sentences, although not final at the time of this writing, constitute yet another step backwards in the recognition and strengthening of constitutional and legal rights of women in Italy.

Rape of Prosperina

Let’s examine the first case. On November 2008, an Italian man of 31 years old kidnapped, robbed and raped a Romanian prostitute. On March 2009, the man was charged with kidnapping, sexual violence and robbery, and was condemned to seven years imprisonment. Nevertheless the most recent sentence by the Court of Appeals of Rome on October 18th reduced his jail time from seven to three years and four months.

The main idea behind this decision was that sex workers by choosing to “work on the street,renounce their physical and moral integrity.” The physical, moral and legal offences to a prostitute cannot be considered equal to that of woman who is “not a prostitute” and, therefore, the crime in question should be judged in light of these attenuating circumstances.

It is clear from this perspective adopted by the Court that women must conform to the attitudes/behaviours that are morally accepted by society. Failing to do so, they run the risk of being punished (by being raped).  This means that men can feel empowered to violate women’s autonomy and not respect the rights of sex-workers because sex workers have neither social nor legal legitimacy.  This sentence, thus, implies different punishments for two kinds of rape. There are rapes of “series A” which have to be strongly punished, and then there are those of “series B” which require less punishment because the victim’s moral transgression or behavior encourages sexual violence.

cortona_rape_of_the_sabine_women

Rape of the Sabine Women

The “series B” category could also be applied to the case of the young girl raped by eight boys in August 2007, in Castro Montalto – a small town close to Viterbo (Rome).  The eight boys, all juveniles at the time, met a 15 year old girl at a party, led her out into the woods, and gang raped her.  A few days later, the girl reported the crime and the boys were identified.  To great public outcry, the mayor of Montalto di Castro provided 20,000 euro to cover legal costs for six of the eight boys -indeed one of the boys seemed to be his nephew.   As mentioned at the beginning of this article, last October 18th the Juvenile Court of Rome settled to suspend the trial, deciding to “put the boys under observation” for 24 months. The young men (two of which are now 18 years old) will have to follow a program of support and control and at the end of this period must demonstrate sincere penitence and apologize to the victim and her family for their deed.  If they pass this test, the court will strike the crime from their record.

Rape of the Sabine Women[/caption]Not only have feminist groups raised their voices in protest, but the public at large has also expressed its indignation over this sentence, whose passing so clearly demonstrates how little traction feminist politics are getting in Italy.  In fact the decision of the Court of Rome shows, for the umpteenth time, an institutional failure to adequately address the issue of violence against women.  While the young men will be absolved and assisted in their reintroduction into society, their victim has been abandoned.  No institution has thought about the social rehabilitation of the girl, who is so traumatized that she has dropped out of school.

Public furor has also been directed at many of the people of Montalto di Castro, who have shown solidarity with the rapists.  One local said “these guys are good boys, they don’t need to rape rather it was this girl that the same day, before of the party, had sex with another boy….”  Someone else commented “if I were 17 years old, I would line up to get with her….the girl is not serious. It is her fault.”  Even the mayor of the city weighed in, implying that native-born Italians are genetically incapable of rape, although for the immigrant population it is another story altogether. “Rape exists only when committed by Romanians” he said, and then added “the only animals in our region are the Romanian immigrants. They’ve got rape in their blood.”  When the Romanian community expressed its displeasure at his comments, he denied ever saying them. The victim’s mother, recognizing that this case is not without its racial and cultural overtones, commented that “my daughter is not getting justice because the boys are Italians.”

The disconcerting comments by the locals of Castro Montalto, along with the decisions by the Court of Appeal of Rome and the Juvenile Court of Rome, demonstrate that after many years of feminist and women’s struggles, Italian public opinion and its institutions still seem to adhere to the idea that women bring sexual violence upon themselves through their behavior.  In other words, when a woman decides to act in a manner not sanctioned by dominant values, her free expression implies a de facto sexual availability, which can be “conquered”, if need be, by means of violence.

In this interpretive light, an act of violence against a woman is, paradoxically, not a consequence of her oppression, but her freedom.  In fact, the freedom of women (and the resulting anxiety that women no longer carry on traditional cultural and national values) compels men to exercise their power and control through violence.  In short, violence against women increases proportionally to the amount of freedom and power that women acquire.

Rape of Europa

Rape of Europa

Violence against women is thus a manifestation of men’s fear about women’s freedom and mobility. This fear, as Italian scholar Tamar Pitch stresses, is “closely linked to fear about the future and the ‘other,’ which leads to the search for – or even the fabrication of- pseudo-homogeneous, pseudo-traditional cultural identities.” As a result, such sentiments lead to the criminalization of migrants, who are potential menaces to national “values.”

From this perspective, the two aforementioned cases illustrate perfectly how in Italy legal and political strategies often use the issue of rape in order to underline the boundaries between “we” and the “others”, “citizens” and “migrants”, “good women” and “bad women.”  According to the reigning criteria in the Italian legal and political discourse, sexual violence most frequently occurs either when a woman chooses to act  “inappropriately,” thus imperiling herself (considering specifically sex-workers), or when migrants rape white women (thus leading to strengthened security measures against immigration).

Once again, in Italy the body of women is used by the political and legal discourse to reinforce and reshape racist and/or moral ideologies and stereotypes.  And once again what is ignored is the structural inequality of power that creates the condition for the social control over women and also undermines women’s security.  And what is lost in the argument, once again, is the real suffering of women.

14 comments

  1. Another Step Backwards For Women’s Rights in Italy http://ff.im/-b3LQ7

  2. Ugh RT: @sexgenderbody: Another Step Backwards For Women’s Rights in Italy http://ff.im/-b3LQ7

  3. RT @sexgenderbody Another Step Backwards For Women’s Rights in Italy http://ff.im/-b3LQ7

  4. Gender & Sexuality Law Blog » Blog Archive » Another Step … http://tinyurl.com/yhnss4f

  5. Another Step Backwards For Women’s Rights in Italy – http://shar.es/aATcg

  6. Italy: court decides rape of sex worker less punishable than that of woman who is not sex worker – http://shar.es/aASKR

  7. I haven’t read such a well-argued and structured article in a while! Very very good job. I think you’ve hit on a key point – the more freedom women have the more men need to reassert “dominance” via sexual aggression. Unfortunately the two classes of rape/women – the moral woman verses the slut – is very real in the United States as well. Perhaps a bit more clouded in “political correctness” than in Italy, the basic sentiment remains the same. Once a woman is sexually expressive – or goes against standard cultural expectations of “morality” – she is lessened as a person, her innate rights taken away. Even to include her ability to parent, have a career, etc. It’s a topic near and dear to my heart. Thank you for posting this!

  8. Bravo, Katherine! You said it just like it is everywhere.

  9. Sadly, 2 days ago Mark Lagon Executive Director of Polaris Project wrote about Italy too, but he didn’t mention any of this. He wrote about Burscolini’s prostitutes, Ashley Dupre, how “john schools” are great.

    http://www.polarisproject.org/component/option,com_wrapper/Itemid,108/

    Makes me sick, his organization echos — “”The main idea behind this decision was that sex workers by choosing to “work on the street,renounce their physical and moral integrity.” The physical, moral and legal offences to a prostitute cannot be considered equal to that of woman who is “not a prostitute” and, therefore, the crime in question should be judged in light of these attenuating circumstances.”” —- Heck, his organization promotes those beliefs. I really want to know what he thinks of these 2 cases you cite.

  10. Berlusconi, rather

  11. […] Yes! certainly Berlusconi must be the worst of the worst woman haters in Italy… Oh…… […]

  12. This is sooo sad. It makes me want to cry but it really gets the point accross and that is what makes it one of the best articles I’ve read on this topic

  13. I’m impressed, I need to say. Really rarely do I encounter a blog that’s each educative and entertaining, and let me inform you, you’ve got hit the nail on the head. Your idea is outstanding; the issue is something that not enough persons are speaking intelligently about. I am very completely satisfied that I stumbled throughout this in my search for something regarding this.

  14. I’m looking joomla template to design site for one hindu temple.? Any suggestion for template and components for Joomla ?. Mainly looking for event details , picture gallery and blogs..

Add a comment


Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.

FEATURED POSTS

CATEGORY CLOUD

"Homeland" Security Abortion Rights Adoption adultery Affordable Care Act Alien Tort Claims Act Amicus Brief Asylum Bankruptcy BDS Bullying Census Politics Children Citizenship Civil Unions Clinic Columbia Law School Compulsory Marriage Condoms Contraception Contraception Mandate Cordoba House Criminal Law Cures for Homosexuality Defense of Marriage Act Disability Rights Discrimination Divorce Domestic Partnership Domestic Violence Domestic Workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Earth Day Economic Justice Education Egypt Elections Employment Discrimination ENDA Estate Planning Events Family Law Fellowships femininity Free Speech Gender and Technology Gender Identity Discrimination Gendering the Economy GSL Online Haiti Hate Crimes Health Care Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton HIV HIV Discrimination Hobby Lobby Homelessness Homophobia Housing Human Rights Identity Politics Illegitimacy (sic) Immigration Reform In-ing Incest India International Law Islamophobia Israel Justice Sotomayor King & Spalding Labor Trafficking Land Reform Law School Legal Profession Legal Scholarship Lesbian & Gay Parenting LGBT Parenting Marital Status Discrimination Marriage Marriage Equality Masculinity Medicaid Michelle Obama Migration Military National Security Obama Administration Obama Appointments Obergefell Outing OWS Palestine Parenting Pinkwashing Policing Politics of the Veil Polyamory Popular Culture Pornograpy Pregnancy Presidential Politics Prisons Privacy Products Liability Profanity Prop 8 Prosecutorial Discretion Publications Public Rights/Private Conscience Public Rights/Private Conscience Project Queer Theory Queer vs. Gay Rights Race and Racism Racial Stereotyping Rape Religion Religious Accommodation Religious Exemption Religious Freedom Restoration Act Religious Fundamentalism Reproductive Rights Reproductive Technology RFRA Romania Rwanda Sartorial Commentary Schools Sex Discrimination Sex Education Sex Stereotyping Sexting Sex Trafficking Sexual Assault Sexual Duplicity Sexual Harassment Sexual Health Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Sexual Orientation Discrimination Sex Work Silencing of voices SMUG Sodomy Law Reform Sports Supreme Court Surrogacy Technology Title IX Trafficking Transgender Uganda Uncategorized Violence Women and Poverty Women of Color Zimbabwe

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.