4 comments  

Maine voters will see on their ballots next Tuesday a proposition to repeal legislation that would have allowed same-sex couples to marry.  The language on the ballot is:

Do you want to reject the new law that lets same-sex couples marry and allows individuals and religious groups to refuse to perform these marriages?

The Research 2000/Daily Kos poll just released the following poll results:

As you may know, there will be one question on the ballot this November in Maine addressing the issue of same-sex unions. In part, it will read “Do you want to reject the new law that lets same-sex couples marry?” A “YES” vote takes away the right of same-sex couples to marry. A “NO” vote keeps the right of same-sex couples to marry. If the election were held today, would you vote YES or NO on this question?

Pew Study

And on the broader question of marriage rights more generally, this is what they found:

Regardless of how you might vote, do you favor or oppose allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry legally?

Pew Study

Latest results: http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2009/10/28/ME/412

As seems true everywhere else, men and women favor or oppose extending marriage rights to same-sex couples is opposite proportions.  Of course, there’s much to be said about why women, overall, are more supportive of this issue.  Possible explanations are:

– since the institution of marriage is typically a less-good deal for women than for men, women are less invested in maintaining its traditional form;

– men suspect, consciously or unconsciously (and I might add rightly or wrongly), that the hetero-patriarchal dividend they get from marriage might lose value if same-sex couples are allowed to wed;

– women are just more enlightened human beings than are men.

We’ll all watch the returns on Tuesday night.   Since game 6 of the World Series will be played that night, maybe the fellas in Maine will be too distracted to get out and vote.

Whatever way it comes out, we are having a forum the day after the election, Wednesday, November 4th,  at 4:30 pm with a panel of experts to discuss Marriage Equality in Maine: Lessons Learned, Future Directions – Room 107, Greene Hall.  Panelists will be: Suzanne Goldberg, Director of the Center for Gender & Sexuality Law; Nate Persily, Charles Keller Beekman Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science; James Tierney, Director of the National State Attorneys General Program at Columbia Law School and former Maine Attorney General; and Jeffrey Lax, Professor of Political Science and co-author of Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness – a well-regarded study published this summer in the American Political Science Review.  The event will be webcast.  More information on that to follow.

4 comments

  1. Gender & Sexuality Law Blog » Blog Archive » Maine Vote on … http://bit.ly/243ptK

  2. Gender & Sexuality Law Blog » Blog Archive » Maine Vote on … http://bit.ly/2Qt8UO

  3. The Q/A format of the second poll question might confuse.

    re: “Do you favor or oppose allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry legally?”

    Yes = Yes, I have an opinion. Yes, I either favor or oppose.

    No = No, I am neutral. I neither favor nor oppose.

  4. Good point, but these are Research 2000/Daily Kos-formulated question.

Add a comment


Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.

FEATURED POSTS

CATEGORY CLOUD

"Homeland" Security Abortion Rights Activism Adoption adultery Advocacy Affordable Care Act Alien Tort Claims Act Amicus Brief Asylum Bankruptcy BDS Bullying Census Politics Children Citizenship Civil Unions Clinic Columbia Law School Compulsory Marriage Condoms Contraception Contraception Mandate Cordoba House Criminal Law Cures for Homosexuality Defense of Marriage Act Disability Rights Discrimination Divorce Domestic Partnership Domestic Violence Domestic Workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Earth Day Economic Justice Education Egypt Elections Employment Discrimination ENDA Estate Planning Events Family Law Fellowships femininity Feminism Free Speech Gender and Technology Gender Identity Discrimination Gendering the Economy Gender Justice GSL Online Haiti Hate Crimes Health Care Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton HIV HIV Discrimination Hobby Lobby Homelessness Homophobia Housing Human Rights Identity Politics Illegitimacy (sic) Immigration Reform In-ing Incest India International Law Intersectional Feminism Islamophobia Israel Jobs Justice Sotomayor King & Spalding Labor Trafficking Land Reform Law School Legal Profession Legal Scholarship Lesbian & Gay Parenting LGBT Parenting Marital Status Discrimination Marriage Marriage Equality Masculinity Medicaid Michelle Obama Migration Military National Security Obama Administration Obama Appointments Obergefell Outing OWS Palestine Parenting Pinkwashing Policing Politics of the Veil Polyamory Popular Culture Pornograpy Pregnancy Presidential Politics Prisons Privacy Products Liability Profanity Prop 8 Prosecutorial Discretion Publications Public Rights/Private Conscience Public Rights/Private Conscience Project Queer Theory Queer vs. Gay Rights Race and Racism Racial Stereotyping Rape Religion Religious Accommodation Religious Exemption Religious Exemptions Religious Freedom Restoration Act Religious Fundamentalism Reproductive Rights Reproductive Technology RFRA Romania Rwanda Sartorial Commentary Schools Sex Discrimination Sex Education Sex Stereotyping Sexting Sex Trafficking Sexual Assault Sexual Duplicity Sexual Harassment Sexual Health Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Sexual Orientation Discrimination Sex Work Silencing of voices SMUG Sodomy Law Reform Solidarity Sports Supreme Court Surrogacy Technology Title IX Trafficking Transgender Uganda Uncategorized Violence Women and Poverty Women of Color Work Zimbabwe

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.