It may well be that this is just a hoax, but it’s a good one, and on a funky Friday afternoon it’s just too good to pass up:

Albert Freed penis painEscambia County Court (Florida) Judge Patricia Kinsey (yes, Kinsey) seems to have released a judgment last week in a case in which Albert Freed sued the Hanes underwear company for damages when “his dream trip to Hawaii was ruined as a result of a manufacturing defect in the new underpants his wife had bought him for the trip.   It seems that Freed, an admittedly heavy-set fellow, could not fit his entire manly estate into the undies, and the briefs “gaped open and acted like a sandbelt on his privates,” causing him actionable discomfort.

Above the Law broke the story this morning, and I’m half inclined to think that the entire thing is a hoax, but it’s pretty funny.  Freed won the trip to Hawaii, the story goes, after winning a competition to sell diet products.  FreedThis part seems to be true, if you watch the video of him pitching diet chocolate cookies on Myspace, where he is pitching diet chocolate cookies to “the ladies” as part of the competition.

The poor guy popped out of his briefs, suffered terrible discomfort as a result, seems to suffer from what David Sedaris calls “Dick-Do” disease (his gut sticks out farther than his dick do) and thus couldn’t see his own injured member.

The whole thing is a total ouch – and you have to read the entire opinion written in the seeming absence of irony by Judge Kinsey, including a wonderful footnote (#4) in which she describes the evidence at trial describing how he puts his underpants on in such a way that implicates is own “misuse” of the undies.

I’ll forgo my usual attempts to offer pithy insights about the connections between the case and, let’s see: gender and underwires/girdles/corsets, or just how masculinity makes you stupid.  You ought to just read the “opinion” for yourself and have a great chuckle about the fact that this case actually went to trial:

Freed Page 1


  1. Man sues over defective underwear: http://trunc.it/2tmf3 [The judge's opinion is a hilarious read.]

  2. Hilarious! RT @Brinstar: Man sues over defective underwear: http://trunc.it/2tmf3 [The judge's opinion is a hilarious read.]

  3. Hilarious! RT @Brinstar: Man sues over defective underwear: http://trunc.it/2tmf3 [The judge's opinion is a hilarious read.]

  4. […] me to quote from the Sexuality & Gender Law Blog: Albert Freed sued the Hanes underwear company for damages when “his dream trip to Hawaii was […]

  5. I carry on listening to the news bulletin talk about getting boundless online grant applications so I have been looking around for the best site to get one. Could you tell me please, where could i get some?

  6. Hi everyone, it’s my first pay a visit at this web site,
    and piece of writing is truly fruitful for me,
    keep up posting such posts.

    Here is my webpage; make money at home (makemoneyexpert.wikidot.com)

  7. Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as long as
    I provide credit and sources back to your blog? My blog site
    is in the very same niche as yours and my users would truly benefit
    from a lot of the information you present here. Please let me know if this alright with you.
    Thanks a lot!

    My blog post yahoo

Add a comment

Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.



"Homeland" Security Abortion Rights Activism Adoption adultery Advocacy Affordable Care Act Alien Tort Claims Act Amicus Brief Asylum Bankruptcy BDS Bullying Census Politics Children Citizenship Civil Unions Clinic Columbia Law School Compulsory Marriage Condoms Contraception Contraception Mandate Cordoba House Criminal Law Cures for Homosexuality Defense of Marriage Act Disability Rights Discrimination Divorce Domestic Partnership Domestic Violence Domestic Workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Earth Day Economic Justice Education Egypt Elections Employment Discrimination ENDA Estate Planning Events Family Law Fellowships femininity Feminism Free Speech Gender and Technology Gender Identity Discrimination Gendering the Economy Gender Justice GSL Online Haiti Hate Crimes Health Care Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton Hiring HIV HIV Discrimination Hobby Lobby Homelessness Homophobia Housing Human Rights Identity Politics Illegitimacy (sic) Immigration Reform In-ing Incest India International Law Intersectional Feminism Islamophobia Israel Jobs Justice Sotomayor King & Spalding Labor Trafficking Land Reform Law School Legal Profession Legal Scholarship Lesbian & Gay Parenting LGBT Parenting Marital Status Discrimination Marriage Marriage Equality Masculinity Medicaid Michelle Obama Migration Military National Security Obama Administration Obama Appointments Obergefell Outing OWS Palestine Parenting Pinkwashing Policing Politics of the Veil Polyamory Popular Culture Pornograpy Pregnancy Presidential Politics Prisons Privacy Products Liability Profanity Prop 8 Prosecutorial Discretion Publications Public Rights/Private Conscience Public Rights/Private Conscience Project Queer Theory Queer vs. Gay Rights Race and Racism Racial Stereotyping Rape Religion Religious Accommodation Religious Exemption Religious Exemptions Religious Freedom Restoration Act Religious Fundamentalism Reproductive Rights Reproductive Technology RFRA Romania Rwanda Sartorial Commentary Schools Sex Discrimination Sex Education Sex Stereotyping Sexting Sex Trafficking Sexual Assault Sexual Duplicity Sexual Harassment Sexual Health Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Sexual Orientation Discrimination Sex Work Silencing of voices SMUG Sodomy Law Reform Solidarity Sports Supreme Court Surrogacy Technology Title IX Trafficking Transgender Uganda Uncategorized Violence Women and Poverty Women of Color Work Zimbabwe

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.