<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marriage Equality &#8211; Where Are We Now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/05/10/marriage-equality-where-are-we-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/05/10/marriage-equality-where-are-we-now/</link>
	<description>A Forum for Debate of Issues in Gender and Sexuality Law at Columbia Law School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:22:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pulse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/05/10/marriage-equality-where-are-we-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>Pulse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/?p=1025#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>Very true we must remember that at one time marriage between members of different racial or ethnic groups was not allowed. Imagine trying to nullify a marriage because of that today!
I&#039;ve also heard an argument that equal marriage rights for gay and lesbian couples hasn&#039;t been approved because the state can take more in taxes from an unmarried couple. Perhaps the comparison to a corporation is a little too close to reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true we must remember that at one time marriage between members of different racial or ethnic groups was not allowed. Imagine trying to nullify a marriage because of that today!<br />
I&#8217;ve also heard an argument that equal marriage rights for gay and lesbian couples hasn&#8217;t been approved because the state can take more in taxes from an unmarried couple. Perhaps the comparison to a corporation is a little too close to reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amor Santiago</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/2009/05/10/marriage-equality-where-are-we-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1801</link>
		<dc:creator>Amor Santiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 10:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/?p=1025#comment-1801</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Gender &amp; Sexuality Law Blog » Blog Archive » Marriage Equality ...: While the Hawaii case “caused the gay co.. http://bit.ly/z68JS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Gender &amp; Sexuality Law Blog » Blog Archive » Marriage Equality &#8230;: While the Hawaii case “caused the gay co.. <a href="http://bit.ly/z68JS" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/z68JS</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
