New York Ends Mandatory Pregnancy Testing For National Guard Soldiers

Posted on March 19th, 2009 by Katherine Franke
 1 comment  

The National ACLU and its New York affiliate announced this week a change in policy preg-testby the New York State National Guard that it will no longer administer mandatory pregnancy tests to female Guard members and will not automatically dismiss female members of the New York Guard when they become pregnant, rather they will be treated like male guards who have temporary disabilities.  This brings New York National Guard policy into conformance with federal and state pregnancy discrimination laws.

If only the Department of Defense would abandon it’s “heterosexuality test” for federal military service!

The ACLU describes the policy reform thus:

Under a new policy announced today, women in the New York National Guard serving on a state active duty task force will no nynglonger be required to take mandatory pregnancy tests or face dismissal from the force if they become pregnant. Instead, they will be treated the same as men who become injured or disabled during a state active duty mission. The change occurred in response to objections raised by the American Civil Liberties Union and the New York Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU’s New York State affiliate.

Soldiers in the New York National Guard had alerted the ACLU about a discriminatory policy requiring women in active duty positions to take periodic pregnancy tests and to periodically sign a form agreeing that becoming pregnant would end their assignments and cancel all associated health benefits, including health benefits for their families. In contrast, male National Guard soldiers on state active duty whose spouses became pregnant were not fired and their families retained health benefits.

“I hope this change will enable women to come forward if they feel they are being discriminated against. Many soldiers were against this policy of pregnancy testing but feared they would lose their jobs if they spoke up,” said Tammy Sullivan, a soldier in the New York National Guard. “The new policy is a step in the right direction to protecting a woman’s right to privacy and ending discrimination against women in the military.”

The ACLU and NYCLU brought their concerns to Governor David A. Paterson’s administration, which resulted in discussions that culminated with this new policy.

“It’s blatantly unfair to dismiss women from National Guard state active duty missions if they are pregnant or refuse to sign a form agreeing to be kicked off a mission if they become pregnant,” said Ariela Migdal, staff attorney with the ACLU Women’s Rights Project. “We are pleased that state officials looked into this discriminatory practice as soon as it was brought to their attention and took swift steps to change the policy.”

Under the new policy, being pregnant no longer automatically disqualifies soldiers from state active duty service, pregnancy tests are not required and women soldiers do not have to sign a special form. The policy now simply requires all soldiers to sign a form indicating their understanding that in order to remain on a state active duty mission they must be physically able to perform all tasks associated with their mission, including physical training drills.

However, under the new policy, pregnant soldiers will be dismissed from state active duty when their pregnancy advances to the point that they cannot physically perform the mission. No alternative assignments, like desk jobs, are available.

“While we are pleased that this blatant discrimination has been addressed, the new policy will still have a disparate impact on women soldiers who will eventually become unable to serve if they become pregnant,” said Galen Sherwin, Director of the Reproductive Rights Project at the NYCLU. “No one who is willing and able to contribute to missions of such vital importance should be dismissed and have their health benefits cut simply because they are unable to perform certain tasks due to injury or pregnancy.”

The old New York National Guard “Statement of Understanding: Pregnancy” can be found online at:

The revised form, “Statement of Understanding of Conditions of Assignment,” can be found online at:

A podcast interview with Tammy Sullivan can be found online at:

– Katherine Franke

One comment

  1. we featured an InfoGraphic by means of that may showed that the market was rebounding. Some objected which the information was basically from a feedback survey of niche players which can have a natural and organic bias. For the ..

Add a comment

Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.



"Homeland" Security Abortion Rights Activism Adoption adultery Advocacy Affordable Care Act Alien Tort Claims Act Amicus Brief Asylum Bankruptcy BDS Bullying Census Politics Children Citizenship Civil Unions Clinic Columbia Law School Compulsory Marriage Condoms Contraception Contraception Mandate Cordoba House Criminal Law Cures for Homosexuality Defense of Marriage Act Disability Rights Discrimination Divorce Domestic Partnership Domestic Violence Domestic Workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Earth Day Economic Justice Education Egypt Elections Employment Discrimination ENDA Estate Planning Events Family Law Fellowships femininity Feminism Free Speech Gender and Technology Gender Identity Discrimination Gendering the Economy Gender Justice GSL Online Haiti Hate Crimes Health Care Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton Hiring HIV HIV Discrimination Hobby Lobby Homelessness Homophobia Housing Human Rights Identity Politics Illegitimacy (sic) Immigration Reform In-ing Incest India International Law Intersectional Feminism Islamophobia Israel Jobs Justice Sotomayor King & Spalding Labor Trafficking Land Reform Law School Legal Profession Legal Scholarship Lesbian & Gay Parenting LGBT Parenting Marital Status Discrimination Marriage Marriage Equality Masculinity Medicaid Michelle Obama Migration Military National Security Obama Administration Obama Appointments Obergefell Outing OWS Palestine Parenting Pinkwashing Policing Politics of the Veil Polyamory Popular Culture Pornograpy Pregnancy Presidential Politics Prisons Privacy Products Liability Profanity Prop 8 Prosecutorial Discretion Publications Public Rights/Private Conscience Public Rights/Private Conscience Project Queer Theory Queer vs. Gay Rights Race and Racism Racial Stereotyping Rape Religion Religious Accommodation Religious Exemption Religious Exemptions Religious Freedom Restoration Act Religious Fundamentalism Reproductive Rights Reproductive Technology RFRA Romania Rwanda Sartorial Commentary Schools Sex Discrimination Sex Education Sex Stereotyping Sexting Sex Trafficking Sexual Assault Sexual Duplicity Sexual Harassment Sexual Health Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Sexual Orientation Discrimination Sex Work Silencing of voices SMUG Sodomy Law Reform Solidarity Sports Supreme Court Surrogacy Technology Title IX Trafficking Transgender Uganda Uncategorized Violence Women and Poverty Women of Color Work Zimbabwe

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.