New Scholarship on Reproductive Rights


Posted on October 21st, 2008 by jeannie.chung

Did you ever stop to think that, despite all the international variations in policy and laws on reproductive rights, the experience of pregnancy and childbirth is truly universal?  We all have been part of the reproductive process, whether going through it or being the product of it. Nancy Northup very eloquently made this point in a recent panel entitled “New Scholarship in Reproductive Rights,” sponsored by the Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the Gender and Sexuality Law Program, and the Human Rights Institute.  In addition to Nancy Northup, President of the Center for Reproductive Rights, panelists included Vickie Jackson, Professor at Georgetown University Law Center (visiting at CLS); Linda Fentiman, Professor at Pace University School of Law (visiting at University of Houston Law Center); Khiara Bridges, CRR/CLS fellow; Jessie Hill, Professor at Case Western University School of Law; and Carol Sanger, Professor at CLS (written submission).

This panel was great for someone (read: me) who cares very much about reproductive rights – but doesn’t know much about what’s been going on on the ground lately.  A few tidbits I learned: (1) abortion regulation varies enormously from country to country, (2) there have been a number of really important transnational cases that have expanded the notion of reproductive rights as human rights issues (i.e., one case in South America where the court found that essentially forcing a woman to give birth and not giving her access to an abortion amounted to cruel and degrading treatment), (3) there is an abundance of criminalization of pregnant women vis-a-vis their fetuses, which really goes against all the goals of criminalization (rehabilitation, deterrence, and so forth), (4) a New York City public hospital provides hostile, judgmental, and thus substandard care to low-income pregnant women of color, who have a reproductive right – to choose to give birth (and, largely by virtue of their race, are scorned by health care professionals who refuse to recognize these women’s rights to reproduce), (5) maybe we need to make access to abortion/reproductive rights a more affirmative governmental duty, (6) maybe we need to sound the discussion of abortion rights in a “right to health” framework because then we have a less gender-specific framework that recognizes the importance of autonomy in medical decision-making and gives respect to the doctor-patient relationship.  Read more about the panel here.  

 

Jeannie Chung

Jeannie Chung

 

Jeannie Chung is a second-year law student and research assistant for the Gender and Sexuality Law Program.

 

Add a comment


Comments are subject to moderation and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Columbia Law School or Columbia University.

FEATURED POSTS

CATEGORY CLOUD

"Homeland" Security Abortion Rights Activism Adoption adultery Advocacy Affordable Care Act Alien Tort Claims Act Amicus Brief Asylum Bankruptcy BDS Bullying Census Politics Children Citizenship Civil Unions Clinic Columbia Law School Compulsory Marriage Condoms Contraception Contraception Mandate Cordoba House Criminal Law Cures for Homosexuality Defense of Marriage Act Disability Rights Discrimination Divorce Domestic Partnership Domestic Violence Domestic Workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Earth Day Economic Justice Education Egypt Elections Employment Discrimination ENDA Estate Planning Events Family Law Fellowships femininity Feminism Free Speech Gender and Technology Gender Identity Discrimination Gendering the Economy Gender Justice GSL Online Haiti Hate Crimes Health Care Hilary Clinton Hillary Clinton HIV HIV Discrimination Hobby Lobby Homelessness Homophobia Housing Human Rights Identity Politics Illegitimacy (sic) Immigration Reform In-ing Incest India International Law Intersectional Feminism Islamophobia Israel Jobs Justice Sotomayor King & Spalding Labor Trafficking Land Reform Law School Legal Profession Legal Scholarship Lesbian & Gay Parenting LGBT Parenting Marital Status Discrimination Marriage Marriage Equality Masculinity Medicaid Michelle Obama Migration Military National Security Obama Administration Obama Appointments Obergefell Outing OWS Palestine Parenting Pinkwashing Policing Politics of the Veil Polyamory Popular Culture Pornograpy Pregnancy Presidential Politics Prisons Privacy Products Liability Profanity Prop 8 Prosecutorial Discretion Publications Public Rights/Private Conscience Public Rights/Private Conscience Project Queer Theory Queer vs. Gay Rights Race and Racism Racial Stereotyping Rape Religion Religious Accommodation Religious Exemption Religious Exemptions Religious Freedom Restoration Act Religious Fundamentalism Reproductive Rights Reproductive Technology RFRA Romania Rwanda Sartorial Commentary Schools Sex Discrimination Sex Education Sex Stereotyping Sexting Sex Trafficking Sexual Assault Sexual Duplicity Sexual Harassment Sexual Health Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic Sexual Orientation Discrimination Sex Work Silencing of voices SMUG Sodomy Law Reform Solidarity Sports Supreme Court Surrogacy Technology Title IX Trafficking Transgender Uganda Uncategorized Violence Women and Poverty Women of Color Work Zimbabwe

Academic Calendar  |  Resources for Employers  |  Campus Map & Directory  |  Columbia University  |  Jobs at Columbia  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. For questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.